Advertisement

CFTO - Sunday, May 26, 2024 - 11:00 a.m. (ET) - Segment #3

Anything for Pets. Wall paper or paint.We make thousands of financialdecisions every day. Stay on top of it all withalerts and insights from the cibc Smart Account. ( ) The fact that this Reese's ad showed up at this exact moment proves that your devices are listening... to your stomach. ( ) Arghhh!!! [woman sneezing] Don't let airborne allergens scare you. Aerius provides fast relief of your 15 worst allergy symptoms. So you can love the air again. Aerius. Sometimes a sub comes along and hits just so right. And then we show it like this and you think: "That can't be $4.99." Guess what? The Subway 6 inch Turkey Breast sub is only $4.99. Not forever. Offer ends June 23rd. >> These women want to know whether the leader of the opposition will ensure that his caucus does not put forward legislation that in any way impinges on women's rights and freedom in particular bodily autonomy. >> We should be frustrated but not at all surprised by the conservatives coming out against dental care. >> It's unbelievable that they will on one hand say they support canadians and on the other hand vote against those supports every single time. >> Vassy: you heard it there, the liberals are amping up their critique of what a pierre poilievre government would do. According to them poilievre would take pay way dental and child care programs and women's reproductive rights. The tories say the liberals are fearmongering because of how far back the grits are in the pollings. Kathleen monk is former ndp strategist and director of communications to the late jack layton. Kory teneycke was ontario premier doug ford's campaign manager and former director of communications for prime minister stephen harper. And scott reid, ctv commentator former communications director to prime minister paul martin. This is kind of picking up on, scott, a buoyant that you made last week where your advice was to kind of pick one thing to go hard at poilievre on. I think they took the second half of that to heart in that they went very hard this week. We picked those clips because they're a real sampling of every single press conference that took place and how it all turned into here's what the conservatives would do. Do you think the strategy will be effective in either the short or long term? >> I think it's broadly the right move, but I have a [indiscernible] first of all, yes, I would hammer like I said last week on cuts and chaos. Just try to brand those [Inaudible] force him into the public arena, force him to deny [indiscernible] [Poor audio quality] play defence for a change but there's two things. One, it's really, really, really important [indiscernible] pick things that people care about, that are driving their vote, that affect their thinking of politics. So I'm not convinced that child care and dental care are the biggest items that I would bang on. I would go after a woman's right to choose, I would say that he wants to cut access to choice. I would definitely say he wants to cut health care, and I would talk about he wants to cut a bunch of the investments we're making to draw plants, draw jobs, draw manufacturing here. Most importantly. Hammer on those things. Jobs, health care. A woman's right to choose. Dental care, child care, I get that these are important programs. I don't think they're vote changers. I don't think that they're things people have come to cherish just yet. They feel more like liberal promises, part of the liberal agenda, they've got to get over themselves, go to what the voters are saying they prioritize and focus on that. >> Vassy: I was watching with interest this week the way the conservatives were or weren't responding, kory. I thought they, you know, there wasn't a lot of opportunity for media for example to ask what the liberals are putting in the window. But I wonder if going forward you think that the conservatives are okay to kind of leave it like we're going to give you these details closer to the election or whether the heightened scrutiny on them because of where they sit in the polls will force them to maybe have to answer those questions earlier. >> I don't think there are going to be -- I don't think they are going to be forced to answer those questions and I think they should ignoring the attacks from the liberals. How I would sum up the liberal attacks, and I agree with scott they need to be more aggressive and more on topics of greater concern to canadians, but I would say that they're, you know, the old saying a day late and a dollar short. I'd say they're a year late and about $10 million short in terms of actually framing this

campaign. You know, the sad reality is, is we're in such an atomized media market these days that, you know, pressure from sort of mainstream media outlets or the government themselves on these questions is probably insufficient. It needs to be backed up by a sustained attack on topics of concern to canadians and through paid media and for whatever reason they continue to not take that approach. >> Vassy: I mean, that circles back to something we talked about frequently, especially now as they do seem to have a very specific strategy in place for going after poilievre or trying to define him. Are you also perplexed that there's not more behind it? There's more social media, I will say. They're very proud of everyone behind the scenes is up 5 million views on that video on capital gains but is that enough? >> First of all, I think that, you know, if you're a betting person it would be a smart strategy to bet on the fact act that maybe the liberals will change their own advertising picks in the coming months, change the law so they can do more government advertising. I wouldn't be surprised if that happened. But I think just to go back to your original question around will the strategy work, I think it has worked in the past and that's been a typical play liberals have used. We saw that in 2004. I think scott was on that campaign. We also saw it in 2019. We saw it in ontario for instance and kathleen wynne in 2014 where she eked out a victory considered tired ontario liberals at the time and once against tim hudak. Basically liberals know the fear play. They know that playbook. The problem is they're fighting against the couch right now. I think people are so apathetic, so angry that how do they actually motivate people and I think the problem is that they can't just keep on pound ago way at the fear and concerns around pierre poilievre. They actually have to put some policy in the window, more positive throws. They can't just feed the policy ground, if you will, to the conservatives and that's what they've been doing so they need a better message on that. It's gotting to a multipronged strategy. They can't just do one thing. They have to do multiple things and very well all at the same time if they're going to get out of this hole. >> Vassy: do you think that's true, scott? I would say I think they think that's what they are doing. I think they think that's what the budget was, right, putting all this new policy, which they constantly he tell me behind the scenes again is popular. It's not making them popular, the policies themselves are popular. They think that was putting the offering in the window and then they're going to combine it with the fear. >> Well, they would argue those are seeds that are going in the ground and somehow they're going to grow into crops. When? Next month, next year, three years from now? Some of those timelines are too late to help. So I would start with the fear, man. You know, kathleen is right. I was there in 2004, in 2014 as well, and I think they need to do what they failed to do the last 18 months and that is really scuff up this wonderful, all things to all people image of pierre poilievre. But -- I'll just kind of repeat what kory said. The problem is even in 2014, which was a very different media marketplace, we used advertising. So having the prime minister and others say these things at microphones after news conferences, on mainstream news, is an incredibly inefficient way, even if it's supplemented by social media, which is also an alternative [Indiscernible] that's less connected to fewer people. It's just doesn't reach now people and it doesn't affect enough people. It's got to be backed up by pure money, money, money. >> Vassy: you've made a few historical references. The other one I was thinking of was another kathleen wynne election, kory, which you would know a lot about, where the momentum for change was so great that despite the fact that there was a lot of, you know, unknowns and fears in some instances about what doug ford would do, he put basically nothing [indiscernible] nothing in the window, didn't answer any of those questions. One-page platform. And still because momentum was so great was able to win. Like, and I guess by that I mean context matters. What is your sense of the context in this? >> Well, the context is affordability. I think that they would be well served to open up a front against their own governor of the bank of canada and talk about interest rates. You know, this is clearly going to be a change election, and that's going to be an uphill struggle for any international student government. But you have to, if you want to have any hope of success, you've got to make the alternative unpalatable, which is the attack side, and you have to show that you have some gas in the tank to make changes in areas where people are concerned about. And to scott's earlier point and I'm sure, kathleen, you're not going to like this, but pharmacare and dental care and some of these other things, they may be of concern to some important voters. They're registering a one or a two on a scale of one to ten. Whereas the fear of renegotiating your mortgage or finding rental housing is appropriate or paying for your grocery bill, those are, like,

nines and tens if not 11 and 12 on that rating scale in terms of intensity and importance to voters. You can't be majoring in the minors I guess is what I would say in terms of the topics you choose to discuss. And the agenda insofar as you have a new agendas as a government has to be laser-like focused on those issues that are actually driving public sentiment and driving that push for change. >> Vassy: the only caveat I would add to that is what if rates start to get cut on june 5th? I don't want to ever present it as oh, people are really rolling in it now. Groceries up 20%, inflation is in the target range but feels terrible, kathleen. But that doesn't mean that the public sentiment can't change overtime. >> If people's desire for change is so great and their anger at this government or exhaustion with this government doesn't change no matter how many quarter points the bank governor might slice off in this year or the next year, I don't think it's going to make that kind of impact. I mean, you're seeing this play out in the U.S. where the U.S. has a roaring economy but no one is giving president biden the credit for that whatsoever and that's because public sentiment right now is not willing to give any political leader any credit. There's no room for victory laps right now and that's the problem. So no one's giving credit to politicians even if they are doing the hard work or putting the policies forward. They're just kind of almost apathetic as I said and that's the challenge in the next election is luring people 06 the couch, getting them to vote, motivate, get enthusiasm back. Enthusiasm is there with the conservative base but how do the progressive parties get their base out and motivated to participate in elections. >> Vassy: got to leave it there. Thanks. Our sunday strategy session, scott reid, kory teneycke, and kathleen monk. When we come back we're going to talk about over it. New data shows public opinion is the lowest it's ever been for the three major political party leaders at this moment. The scrum will be here to talk about that. Then over to france and one of the soldiers who lost his life there in the first world war. and the road trip of the summer is an ice cold drink from McDonald's. Like a Small McCafe Iced Coffee or a refreshing Coca Cola for $1 plus tax. Step up your summer today. When you back hurts, life hurts. Robax dual action formula relieves pain and relaxes tight muscles. Take back your back with Robax. Today I'm plating something special. Not for my customers. For my cat. Fancy Feast obsesses over food like I do, with delicious little details and one extra ingredient: love. Fancy Feast. Love is in the details If you're lost You can look And you will find me Time after time For everything you care about. Intact Insurance. [knocking] “It's Love” by Chris Knox I need you I need you every single day And I want you I want you every single way And I need you I need you every single way and i... It's love (repeating) It's la la la la la la It's love (repeating) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Loving the uncommon is a wonderful thing we have in common. ( ) Mother: My family loves to travel. Whoa... (Exhaling) And I love it when they all come back home. Toffifee combines what everyone loves. Caramel, hazelnut, nougat cream and chocolate. (Laughter) ( ) ( ) Daisy Wild, The New Eau de Parfum, by Marc Jacobs. Introducing Madri Excepcional, inspired by the soul of Madrid. ( ) a new crisp, and smooth, Spanish style lager, now available in Canada. (sigh) Italy... KFC's $5 Sandwich of the Day is back. Only in Canada. Have a great trip...

Copyright protected and owned by broadcaster. Your licence is limited to private, internal, non-commercial use. All reproduction, broadcast, transmission or other use of this work is strictly prohibited.

Transcripts