Advertisement

Arsenal’s set-piece guru on VAR & the evolution of set-pieces in modern football

Arsenal’s set-piece guru on VAR & the evolution of set-pieces in modern football
Arsenal’s set-piece guru on VAR & the evolution of set-pieces in modern football

In a revealing interview with L’Équipe, Nicolas Jover, the mastermind behind Arsenal‘s set-pieces, delved into the intricacies of his craft, shedding light on the evolving landscape of dead-ball situations in modern football.

Nicolas Jover with Manchester City (Photo via Charles Watts on Twitter)
Nicolas Jover with Manchester City (Photo via Charles Watts on Twitter)

Jover, who joined Arsenal in 2021 after successful stints at Brentford and Manchester City, emphasised the growing importance of set-pieces, stating, “The higher the level, the more CPAs (set-pieces) matter.” He dismissed the notion that set-pieces are merely a “weapon of the weak,” highlighting that even top clubs like Manchester City and Arsenal prioritise maximising their effectiveness in this area.

Jover: "The teams are more aggressive" Responsible for set-pieces at Arsenal since 2021, the Frenchman deciphers the trends and the weight of these phases in modern football. L'Équipe30 Jun 2024 You only have to watch Arsenal play to know him: at every corner, every free kick, Mikel Arteta backs down and gives way to Nicolas Jover on the sidelines to command or simply supervise the sequence. "The ideal is not to intervene, but it's not folklore and, sometimes, it allowed us to score, " supports the 42-year-old Frenchman, boss of set-pieces (CPA) at Arsenal, since 2021, after having already held this position when he arrived in England, at Brentford (2016-2019), then at Manchester City (2019-2021) with Pep Guardiola. In his field, he is one of the best in the world, having started his career as a video analyst in Montpellier. At the heart of the Euro, he evokes the place of CPAs and their evolution in modern football. "The higher the level, the more CPAs matter: is this a misconception? It reminds me of the historical blockage on CPAs even ten years ago, when it was said that it was the weapon of the weak. But I was hired by Manchester City, then Arsenal: everyone wants to profit from everything, there are no reasons to deprive themselves of a weapon like CPAs to win. CPAs were seen as marginal gains, but at 20%, they are essential gains. Today, I no longer need to convince the players, but, at the beginning, I was telling them: "We can increase your salary by 20%, what do you think?”But the percentage doesn't interest me much: I don't want us to score less in the dynamic game… Does VAR have an impact? It plays tricks on those who were playing the offside, especially on free kicks. They are often at the limit and now, to the nearest centimeter, it can be expensive. VAR also has an impact on defensive corners, on individual marking, on the way to contain or hold players. Is the number of players present in the surface on CPA changing? Yes, we have seen an evolution this year. What was simply related to the context, before, when seven attacking players found themselves in the box in situations at the end of the match when it was necessary to score, we see it more often at 0-0. The teams are more aggressive. When we work an offensive CPA, we also work the following counter? We attach as much importance to it. Five or six years ago, it wasn't identified as much. Now, very clearly, we see very definite intentions on how to attack in the second phase, and the moment of transition when the attacking team must reorganize to defend. “After seven or eight matches, a combination can work again it's doing 'it' The size, all the difference? This is one element, among others, aggressiveness, timing. But a big, aggressive one with good timing is perfect (smile). With us, for example, Gabriel Martinelli has very good timing, he is dynamic, aggressive, has confidence in himself and wants to score. Sometimes players who are a little less mobile don't take advantage of their large size. So it's not enough. Are screens widespread today? Yes, they are widely used. The principle is to stay at the limit, depending on cultural differences in arbitration. We were surprised, sometimes, in the Champions League, where we saw that defenders deliberately fall to influence the referee. But, in England, it's bold, because the referee doesn't blow the whistle. How long does an invention remain effective? At Arsenal, this season, we saw at the end of the season a cell of players at the third post, along the line… We've done it before, even in years past. In fact, it depends on the number of matches during which we have an opponent. After seven or eight matches, a combination can work again. Are CPAs, at the defensive level, based mainly on individual responsibility? It exists but it is a team that takes a goal. When a player is beaten, it doesn't mean that the others have to watch and be passive. It's like in the dynamic game, when one player is beaten, the others must intervene. It's more difficult because it goes very quickly, but sometimes it's possible. What is the majority trend? Individual marking, zone, or mixed? It's cultural. In Portugal, for example, they are almost all in the zone. In the French national team, in general, there are two players in the zone and five or six in individual marking. We call it mixed, but in my personal classification, up to three players in the zone and the others in individual marking, it's still individual marking, since no opponent will be free. The zone, for me, is from four, since there at least one attacking player will be free. The secret is to target an area? If it's a secret I won't say it, but if you're targeting a small area, you're going to have to rely on a great shooter, and everything will fall apart if the ball doesn't arrive in the area. So, there are different approaches depending on the characteristics of the players. The secret is rather to exploit these characteristics. What would be the main principles to apply? I still haven't identified a golden rule. We learn, we discover, we experiment, we try to get the best out of the players, see what they believe in, and go together. I am not convinced that there are principles that work in all contexts and constantly. There is aggressiveness, individual responsibility within a collective, defined roles, the choice to target, one, two or three players, but there is no truth. Everton are very effective from the corner by doing exactly the same thing, all the time. Other teams change every match. City were very effective two years ago, less so this year, changing every game. The quality of the execution is essential.»
Jover: “The teams are more aggressive” – L’Equipe 30 June 2024

The Arsenal coach stressed that set-pieces are no longer just “marginal gains,” but “essential gains” that can significantly impact a game’s outcome. “Today, I no longer need to convince the players, but, at the beginning, I was telling them: ‘We can increase your salary by 20%, what do you think?'” Jover quipped, highlighting the growing recognition of the value of set-pieces in modern football.

Jover also addressed the influence of VAR (Video Assistant Referee) on set-piece tactics, noting that it has made it more challenging to exploit offside situations, particularly from free kicks. “They are often at the limit and now, to the nearest centimetre, it can be expensive,” he explained.

The conversation extended to the increasing number of players present in the box during attacking set-pieces. “The teams are more aggressive,” Jover observed, noting that this tactic, once reserved for late-game situations, is now being employed more frequently even at 0-0.

He also emphasised the importance of preparing for counter-attacks after an offensive set-piece. “Five or six years ago, it wasn’t identified as much. Now, very clearly, we see very definite intentions on how to attack in the second phase, and the moment of transition when the attacking team must reorganise to defend,” he said.

Jover discussed the significance of player attributes like size, aggression, and timing in set-piece success. “A big, aggressive one with good timing is perfect (smile),” he remarked, citing Gabriel Martinelli as an example of a player with excellent timing and a strong desire to score.

The use of screens, a tactic designed to create confusion and disrupt the opposition’s defensive organisation, was also a topic of discussion. Jover acknowledged their widespread use but noted that their effectiveness can vary depending on cultural differences in refereeing. “We were surprised, sometimes, in the Champions League, where we saw that defenders deliberately fall to influence the referee. But, in England, it’s bold, because the referee doesn’t blow the whistle,” he said.

Jover then shed light on the lifespan of set-piece innovations, stating, “After seven or eight matches, a combination can work again.” He explained that the effectiveness of a particular routine depends on the frequency with which a team faces the same opponent.

The interview also touched upon the defensive aspect of set-pieces. Jover emphasised the collective responsibility in defending set-pieces, stating, “It’s a team that takes a goal. When a player is beaten, it doesn’t mean that the others have to watch and be passive.”

Jover shared his insights on the different defensive approaches used in set-pieces, such as individual marking, zone marking, and mixed marking. He noted that the preferred approach often varies depending on the team’s culture and philosophy.

He also discussed the concept of targeting specific areas during set-pieces, emphasising the importance of tailoring strategies to the characteristics of the players involved. “The secret is rather to exploit these characteristics,” he said.

In conclusion, Jover’s interview offered a comprehensive and insightful look into the complex world of set-piece tactics. His expertise and innovative approach have undoubtedly contributed to Arsenal’s success in this area, and his continued evolution as a coach promises further advancements in the future.