You decide: Are Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens Hall of Famers?

Would you vote for Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens on your Hall of Fame ballot? Tell us why or why not using #SportsDebate & we'll RT a few.

— Yahoo! Sports (@YahooSports) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports BIG YES to Barry Bonds. Most feared hitter of ALL TIME. Would see 1 maybe 2 pitches a night & put it in the bay #SportsDebate

— Casey Torres (@caseytorres) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports Who would vote for Cheaters? Lance Armstrong is okay then? Give Ben Johnson his Gold back then? #SportsDebate

— AlbertaShank (@KKineshanko) December 20, 2012

@carltoersbijns @kkineshanko @yahoosports Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens were HOF's BEFORE PED use. L. Armstrong was on PED's from day 1

— Dorian Adeyemi (@thats_whatDsaid) December 20, 2012

@kkineshanko @yahoosportsNOT me; I want the kids to have role models that aren't under the influence of PED's and do it right w integrity

— Carl Toersbijns (@carltoersbijns) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports Not on the first ballot but eventually yes, they're among the most dominant players ever (with or without PED's) #SportsDebate

— Andrew Spero (@Aspero28) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports No, that would just encourage future cheating and extend baseball's steroid era. Nip it in the bud. #SportsDebate

— kbdullah (@kbdullah) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports yes. Barry was a HOFer before his head grew (physically). Plus the playing field was even, everyone was doing it.

— Adam T. Forbes (@AdamTForbes) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports Hell no.I grew up looking up to them, in awe of their talent - only to find out they cheated.#SportsDebate

— Luke Principato (@LukemanP) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports simply, yes. If they don't make it than no one between 85-05 era should, because they possibly could have used PED's.

— William Pullin (@WillPullin) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports @yahoosports No, that would be the same as voting against integrity and pride. #SportsDebate

— TobaccoRdMayor (@TobaccoRdMayor) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports absolutely.They were the best in an era of steroid use in which a multitude of players were using.Just * the time period

— Ryan Johnson (@beerfan09) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports #sportsdebate It's the hall of fame, not the hall of the holy, it's for fans. It's a museum, put them in and get over it!

— John Donson (@GrimbleSmintz) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports I would vote neither they cheated never rationalize cheating this is coming from a guy who IDOLIZED the rocket #SportsDebate

— edwintorres (@Edtorr22) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports Bonds had HOF career. I hold MLB and MLBPA responsible for turning a blind eye for the sake of profit. #SportsDebate

— James Garnett (@topchef58) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports Nope. The Hall of Fame is a hallowed institution meant to celebrate players who played baseball the right way. #sportsdebate

— Brian Principato (@BNPinDC) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports hell no! Cheaters deserve no respect. Cheaters ruin the game. If anything they should never be talked about again.

— Mark (@hockeypooljunky) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports Definitely not. They lied to the fans for way too long.

— Kirk Strait (@KirkStrait) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports Bonds 7 MVPs & 8 gold gloves, Clemens 1MVP & 7Cy Youngs. Both were #1stballot HOFers before any PED #speculation #SportsDebate

— David Rowse (@DavidRowse) December 20, 2012

@yahoosports we need a special wing of the HOF where they should be enshrined. It should be left dark.

— Jim Dorsey (@jamezdhawaii) December 20, 2012