What makes an NBA team watchable? It's a little complicated
This statement has been utilized a number of times to open articles over the course of the last few months, but here goes: the NBA is back.
So let us dive into the circadian rhythm of televised basketball whence we came — the shift in season where a game of 30 teams determines our cortisol levels and commitment to regulated sleep patterns. With every offseason, we settle back into our tempos — not unlike the summer breaks of our youth — and with 14 days until games begin, I’m met with a familiar electric air of excitement for the camaraderie and comfort in routine the annual NBA season brings.
As with any typical end to the offseason, fans of the league share the teams they’ll be looking to watch extensively through the year. This got me thinking: what components actually lend to the watchability of a team?
Winning is only part of the equation
It’s not always as simple as “winning,” seeing as how multiple losing ball clubs draw the interest of both the leisure viewer and discerning critic. It’s measured by a different binary. It’s about a culture and eagerness that is difficult to quantify, despite being so plainly present.
The most major component contributing to watchability is relative cultural necessity. Not the usual culture we associate with a team, typically relating to the competence of coaching, front office and its ownership. This is specifically in relation to the team’s place in its given community.
How much do the inhabitants strolling by arenas and watching local commercials featuring star players value the franchise? Is the jersey woven into the fabric of morning commutes and evenings at the mall? Do we associate the team colours with a mental illustration of the city? When I think Boston, I think green. When I think L.A., I think purple and gold. When I think Memphis, I imagine their clear skies mimic the easy blues of their uniform.
It’s no coincidence the teams deemed most unwatchable seem offbeat in relation to their location. Think the Sacramento Kings and the evident disconnect between ownership and the heartbeat of this California town. As if it’s difficult for the viewer to find value in a team that doesn’t seem like it belongs to the city it claims to represent. This established cultural necessity requires years of theoretical and manual grassroots work.
A relevant example is the “We the North” campaign put forth by the Toronto Raptors over half a decade ago. In the present, the team reaps the monetary benefits of its early efforts sown with locals, but such benefits required years of consistent and relentless engagement with the community. When a team is important to the city, our chronic FOMO (fear of missing out) stimulates our curiosities. This is why I sometimes find myself watching the Blazers’ backcourt buzz around at 10:30 pm on a weeknight. What’s the city of Portland up to?
The hope for a better tomorrow
Being hypnotized by any wreckage happens because it’s so rare to witness live destruction. It’s no longer hypnotic rubbernecking if the crash happens 82 times a season — that’s just redundant scheduled programming. The outcome becomes too predictable.
With NBA basketball, we may find a franchise hard to quit because of childhood affiliations and once-fond memories, but generally, even losing teams need to spark a sense of hopefulness and anticipation for the viewer. If they aren’t good today, they likely will be in the near future. It’s the difference between a perpetual rebuild and drafting the gem of the class, or the difference between the Spurs phasing out of two decades of relevance and the Knicks having yet to fade in.
Stripped down to its core, sport is a form of play. Stripped further of vitals like “winning” or “anticipation,” it becomes torturous — like a movie with no end, a tunnel with no light. This is why less-than-stellar regular season records don’t fully explain the cult followings of a team like the Phoenix Suns, a club that has further fanned the flame of excitement with their offseason acquisition of the sought-after Chris Paul. We’re seeing a concerted effort of a team seeking to maximize their young talent and construct a thoroughly watchable squad.
You may’ve noticed, but it’s only been during the wobbly uncertainty of the last several months that discussions about the reasoning and purpose behind televised basketball have really been brought forth beyond esoteric articles in academic fields. If anything, exploring these themes more often in the mainstream will lead to a more robust establishment and perhaps more watchable teams, especially considering the significant loss of revenue the league has endured over the course of 2020 and likely even the next season.
What we do know for sure is that engaged audiences are earned and although the formula seems simple enough, it requires specialized efforts not all teams are willing to invest in.
More from Yahoo Sports
Create or join a 2020 Yahoo Fantasy Basketball League for free today
Play Daily Fantasy and earn 1,000 Yahoo Sports Rewards Points with your first deposit