Is it OK not to save for retirement? Sometimes, the answer may be yes. Here's why.

Everyone knows they should be saving for retirement. But are there times when they shouldn’t?

Turns out, the answer is yes.

That doesn’t mean people shouldn't build a nest egg – because they do need to save and plan for life after their working years end, financial advisers say.

But it does mean there are times that they might want to take a break from saving to put their money toward other, more pressing needs.

So when are those times?

Do you have a lot of debt?

If you have a lot of debt, you should check the interest rates to consider whether it’s more important to use your money to pay it down instead of continuing to sock it away for retirement. If the rates are high, pay down your debts first.

“If a credit card’s charging you 18% interest, where would you get an 18% return (on investments)?” said Max Jaffe, a CPA and planning counselor at TBS Retirement Planning. "You can give yourself an 18% return by paying it off.”

If you don’t, Jaffe warns the debt “will overpower you,” and fast.

To see how fast, use the Rule of 72, a quick back-of-the-envelope way of calculating when an investment, or debt in this case, will double. It works like this: Divide 72 by the interest rate number, which is 18 in this case, and you get four. That means your debt, if not paid down at all, will double in four years.

Ballooning debt: US credit card debt hit a record high as inflation leaves consumers financially stressed

Why not autopay? Before you set up autopay on your credit cards, consider this big drawback first

Skipping debt: Is it possible to avoid student debt? These career, education tracks offer a different path

Do you have an emergency savings fund?

If the answer is no, you should pause saving for retirement and shift your money toward building a fund.

“With the current economy, it’s a good time to talk about that,” said Rich Guerrini, president and CEO of PNC Investment. “With the economic challenges we’ve experienced over the last 12 months and will experience over the next 12 to 24 months, the idea of layoffs is real. Without an emergency fund, that really makes that scenario dire.”

You should aim to have at least three months of living expenses in an emergency fund, but the rule of thumb is to have six to 12 months to cover any unexpected developments.

Cushioning: 37% of Americans worry their emergency funds aren't big enough: How to build yours fast

Survival guide: Strategies for seniors to fight the economic downturn

Can your savings last 25 years?

When you start taking distributions from your retirement funds, you probably can stop saving.

If you’re looking for a number, a general rule of thumb is to divide your savings by 25, “because chances are you’ll be retired for 25 years,” Jaffe said. That amount will grow each year because of inflation, so keep that in mind. But if the amount will cover a year of expenses and inflation, “you’ll know you’re there” and can stop if you want, he said.

Home, sweet home: Low on savings? Here's how your home might save your retirement.

New rules: Secure 2.0 Act: What the new retirement law means for your 401(k), IRA, 529 and more

Are you young or poor?

A research report published last year in The Journal of Retirement argues that young people shouldn’t save for retirement. The theory hinges on the “life-cycle model,” which means people naturally tailor their spending based on where they are in life to keep their standard of living steady.

That means young people will spend the little money they earn to keep a certain standard of living, middle-aged workers who earn more will be able to keep that lifestyle and save, and older people will spend their savings to maintain their way of living.

Additionally, the report said, “low-income workers, whose wage profiles tend to be flatter, receive high Social Security replacement rates, making optimal saving rates very low.”

Retirement investing: What are the 401(k) contribution limits for 2023?

Take the free money: Who wants "free money"? Check out Robinhood's IRA offer: 1% match for retirement savings

Maxing out: 3 steps to claiming the $4,555 max monthly Social Security benefit

The report argues that if young or low-income workers are forced to save for retirement, they could end up taking on toxic levels of debt or making tax-inefficient withdrawals from savings to meet spending needs, resulting in worse overall outcomes.

This is extremely controversial, and most financial planners will tell you that approach could be risky.

“The risk is I am 25 years old, and retirement is 40 years away,” Guerrini said. “But the time value of money and power of compounding interest, those early years, you can never make up for. The shorter the timeline drastically impacts your retirement.”

Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Not saving for retirement isn't always a bad idea. Here's why.