What's buzzing:

Officials risk complicating a playoff system

National Football Post

Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany met with members of the media this past Wednesday in Chicago and discussed one possible way of determining a national champion in college football once a four-team playoff is implemented in 2014.

Delany said that a "conference champion only" model is being discussed that would include teams that won their leagues, but the squads would only qualify if they were ranked among the top six teams in the country.

For instance, if a team such as Alabama won the SEC and was among the top six teams in the rankings (perhaps a tweaked version of the current BCS standings), the Crimson Tide would automatically qualify for the playoff and be one of the top four ranked conference champs to qualify among the top six.

If there are less than four conference champs among the final top six, however, then the remaining spot or spots in the playoff would be filled by the highest ranked non-champ or, in the case of Notre Dame or BYU, an independent if that team is in the top six (So if Nos. 1, 2, and 6 are conference champs and Nos. 3, 4, and 5 are not, then Nos. 1, 2, 6 and 3 would qualify for a four-team playoff).

Of course, we already know that SEC commissioner Mike Slive wants the playoff participants to simply be the top four teams in the final rankings, the idea being those teams are the strongest no matter if it was a league champion.

View photo

Larry Scott
Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott, like Big Ten boss Jim Delany, prefers the four-team playoff to include conference champs only.

Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott, like Delany, prefers including conference champs only.

One of the bigger debates surrounding a future playoff system has been how to rank the teams and which squads would be eligible for a four-team model. I would prefer that the current BCS ranking system be tweaked to include other factors such as strength of schedule. Others, however, have suggested that using a selection committee would be the best option, and a committe is something that Delany said he prefers.

Revenue distribution among all of the conferences is also another issue, especially with the AQ and non-AQ statuses likely to be shed after 2013. At the meeting in Chicago, Delany wouldn't divulge any information when the revenue topic was broached. He did remain optimistic, however, that the new playoff model would be finalized in time to present it to the Presidential Oversight Committee for approval June 20 in Chicago.

If we take a look back and see how Delany's plan would have affected a few previous postseasons, 11-1 third-ranked Michigan would not have made a four-team playoff in 2006. That bid would have gone to Big East champion Louisville, which also was 11-1. Imagine the uproar in Ann Arbor if that had occured.

In 2008, No. 4 Alabama would not have advanced to a four-team playoff either because No. 2 Florida was the SEC champ, defeating the Crimson Tide in Atlanta. Nick Saban's squad would have been left out, along with No. 3 Texas, because No. 5 USC and No. 6 Utah were conference champs that year.

My fear is that the plan discussed by Delany is too complex for a sport that is already thriving. While I am not a proponent of anything more than a Plus-One, the fact is that a four-team playoff is on the horizon. Why toss around confusing proposals? Despite various factors to work through on our way to a playoff, why not try to make things as simple as possible by inviting the top four teams — conference champ or not — to the playoff? Doesn't a system lose some credibility if teams ranked Nos. 1-4 at the end of the year aren't the teams in a four-team playoff? Even if we have the two top-ranked conference champions and select two at-large teams, it still wouldn't top the alternative. Either way, we will still hear complaints about the teams occupying the No. 5 and No. 6 spots in a four-team playoff system. I would simply argue that the No. 3 and No. 4 teams have made stronger cases.

Whether or not the current BCS standings are tweaked or if a committee is put together to select the playoff teams, simplicity should be the general rule of thumb for these decision-makers. The current system is without a doubt a bit flawed. And change is coming. But if the BCS officials aren't careful, they can ruin what is already a pretty good thing — the best regular season in sports and a postseason that fuels unlimited discussion, for good or for bad.

Email dave.miller@nationalfootballpost.com or follow me on Twitter at Miller_Dave

Follow @footballpost on Twitter for the latest news
View Comments (1)
  • Cycling-Astana plunged into controversy again over Boom

    By Julien Pretot UTRECHT, Netherlands, July 3 (Reuters) - The Astana team were plunged into controversy again when Dutch rider Lars Boom faced being thrown out of the Tour de France because of low Cortisol levels on the eve of the start. Astana, … More »

    Reuters - 5 minutes ago
  • Daytona adds soft walls, more asphalt

    Daytona adds soft walls, more asphalt

    NASCAR's most famous race track is seemingly safer and possibly more politically correct as the series returned to its birthplace Friday. Daytona International Speedway, in the final push of a $400 million renovation, has come close to covering the … More »

    AP - Sports - 7 minutes ago
  • Bour's homer lifts Marlins past Cubs 2-1

    Bour's homer lifts Marlins past Cubs 2-1

    Justin Bour and Christian Yelich homered and the Miami Marlins got six impressive innings from Tom Koehler in a 2-1 win over the Chicago Cubs on Friday. Bour's solo home run in the sixth inning off Cubs starter Jason Hammel snapped a 1-1 tie. … More »

    AP - Sports - 22 minutes ago
  • Ottawa Redblacks looking to win consecutive games for the first time

    The Ottawa Redblacks would love nothing more than to make a little history in their home opener Saturday night against the B.C. Lions. After winning their season opener against the Montreal Alouettes, the Redblacks (1-0) have an opportunity to win … More »

    The Canadian Press - 25 minutes ago
  • Peter Pocklington wins appeal of probation violation ruling in U.S. court

    Former Edmonton Oilers owner Peter Pocklington has won a court victory in the United States that means he won't have to go to jail. In September 2013, a judge in Riverside, Calif., sentenced Pocklington to six months for violating a term of his … More »

    The Canadian Press - 26 minutes ago