Advertisement

What is affirmative action? More Americans dislike practice as Supreme Court strikes it down

The Supreme Court struck down affirmative action admission policies Thursday in a pair of cases involving Harvard College in Massachusetts and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, which had adopted such practices in an effort to diversify their student bodies.

Affirmative action policies became common in the 1960s and 1970s as college administrators looked to increase racial and gender diversity on their campuses, and challenges to them have taken place ever since. The first major fight came to a head in 1978, when the Supreme Court outlawed racial quotas in college admissions while saying race could still be considered as a factor.

Blocked: Supreme Court ends use of affirmative action at Harvard, UNC in blow to diversity efforts

What is the history of affirmative action in the US?

In 1961, President John F. Kennedy signed an executive order mandating that federal contractors “take affirmative action” to ensure applicants were hired and treated equally regardless of “race, creed, color or national origin.”

Kennedy’s measure followed longtime efforts to end segregation and widespread discrimination that had stripped generations of Black people of wealth and opportunities for job advancement, and the practice spread as corporate and other government organizations sought to right decades of lost opportunities – not just for Black people but for women and other minority communities.

Additionally, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act forbids exclusion from federally funded programs or activities on the basis of race, color or national origin while Title VII prohibits employment discrimination “based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.”

As the struggles and gains of the civil rights movement prompted national reckoning, experts say, colleges and universities began to adopt similar admission and recruitment approaches.

Then, in 1970, an order issued by President Richard Nixon extended adjustable minority hiring goals and timetables to federal contractors to address their "underutilization;" the order was revised the following year to include women.

Take a look at the numbers: What do Harvard, UNC student populations look like?

Affirmative action drew growing scrutiny

In 1978, the Supreme Court ruled in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke that the school’s special admissions program, with slots set aside based on race alone, was unlawful. However, the court said universities could consider race as a factor when choosing among qualified applicants.

In 1979, the court ruled in United Steel Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. Weber that affirmative action efforts attempting to correct long patterns of discrimination were lawful so long as they didn’t violate the rights of white workers.

By 1995, the University of California system had voted to halt all affirmative action programs. The next year, state voters narrowly approved Proposition 209, which ended such programs in employment, education and contracting; similar measures followed in Washington and Florida.

Proponents for affirmative action in higher education rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court before oral arguments in Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina in October.
Proponents for affirmative action in higher education rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court before oral arguments in Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina in October.

After a Michigan ban on affirmative action in public college admissions was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2014, seven more states instituted related statutes: Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Washington.

Last year, the Supreme Court said it would take on the two cases it ruled on Thursday challenging the ability of colleges and universities to consider race as a factor in school admissions. In heated discussions held last October, the court’s conservative majority expressed severe doubts about whether such policies were necessary.

How do Americans feel about affirmative action?

Results of a Pew Research Center survey released earlier this month indicate half of all U.S. adults say they disapprove of selective colleges and universities factoring applicants’ racial and ethnic backgrounds into their admission decisions. Only a third (33%) of the nearly 5,100 people surveyed earlier this year said they approved, while roughly one in six (16%) hadn’t decided.

Disapproval was even more pronounced along partisan lines, the survey found, with nearly three-quarters (74%) of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents saying they disapprove, compared to just 29% of Democrats. Meanwhile, 54% of Democrats and those leaning Democrat said they approved of the practice, compared to just 14% of Republicans.

Michael Wang, a poster child for the anti-affirmative action movement, often shared his college admissions experience and publicly advocated for a more fair process for other Asian Americans. He now worries that the movement may have gone too far.
Michael Wang, a poster child for the anti-affirmative action movement, often shared his college admissions experience and publicly advocated for a more fair process for other Asian Americans. He now worries that the movement may have gone too far.

The study also found notable differences between racial and ethnic groups, with nearly half (47%) of Black American adults saying they approved of institutions of higher education factoring race and ethnicity into their admissions decisions. Meanwhile, the portions of Latinos who said they either approved or didn’t approve of the practice were evenly split at 39%, while 57% of white adults and 52% of Asian adults said they did not approve.

What are the arguments for and against affirmative action?

Supporters of affirmative action say such policies are needed to combat ongoing inequities that have left certain communities historically underrepresented in schools and the workplace. Such policies also contribute to greater diversity, an effect they note is beneficial for all.

Removing such policies, they say, will ultimately decrease diversity in workplace leadership and in the boardroom.

Critics, meanwhile, say that in terms of college admissions, affirmative action programs make it harder for Asian and white students to gain entry by giving preference to Black and Latino applicants.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Affirmative action in colleges: what is it, do Americans want it?