Jersey Fouls: Internet porn rules, Coyotes animal fouls and profane Justin Faulk tribute

Jersey Fouls is our ongoing exploration of the rules and etiquette for proper hockey jersey creation and exhibition. If you spot what you think may be a foul in your arena, email a photo to us at puckdaddyblog@yahoo.com for inclusion in future installment.

Uh … wut?

Reader Emily B. captured these Fouls at Game 5 of the Phoenix Coyotes' first-round series against the Chicago Blackhawks. Little did she know she'd be on the National Geographic beat that night.

Say hello to Horny Rabbit and Angry Squirrel.

So what are we looking at here? Inside references? Pet names?

Let's assume it's player related, based on the numbers. Has Daniel Winnik (the most recent, and prominent, No. 34 for the Coyotes) ever gone by the "Horny Rabbit" moniker?

Are Keith Ballard and/or David Rundblad known by their spirit animals, the Angry Squirrel?

As we often do, we're asking for insight and clarity on this one. If you are either the Horny Rabbit or the Angry Squirrel, or know what any of this means, hit us as puckdaddyblog@yahoo.com. Our sanity depends on it.

Coming up ... well, an incredible collection of Fouls.

And here … we … go.

Christopher Rutledge

is bringing J-Fouls to new highs.

This jersey was from a Portland Winterhawks game, and the good news is that it's now legal to wear this in neighboring Washington.

This isn't the first Foul to honor the legacy of Grandpa's Magic Eye Medicine, obviously; but it might be the first one in which the fan is also wearing the tail of a small mammal. Or is being violated by a puma. One of the two.

From reader Mike, a Philadelphia Flyers Foul.

Thank the gods he slapped that W CLASSIC and '12' on the back of the sweater, or else we'd have to rely on the giant [expletive] patch on his shoulder and our own unfailing memory to recall that the Flyers wore these in the Winter Classic.

Reader David Poulter sends in this Foul, and writes:

Now, we're as Internet savvy as the next guy in his parents' basement, but 'Rule 34' was a little lost on us. That is, until we Knew Our Meme and OMG is that brilliant: "Rule 34 is an Internet adage in the 'Rules of the Internet' list of protocols and conventions which asserts that if something exists, there is porn of it."

Many of you have sent in tips on the Shop NHL ads which feature a plethora of J-Fouls, like this one from earlier in the year. Reader 'NYR M.' was a little perturbed by something he saw in the commercial:

From 'NYR M.':

It's a fair point. Obviously, the jersey's a tribute to Messier's vow in 1994, the year he became The Greatest Captain In The History of Hockey And/Or Captains. But with Boogaard still in the thoughts of Rangers fans, it might have been jarring to see his number at the start of an advertisement for vanity jerseys.

We try to keep the '69' sweaters on Jersey Fouls to a minimum because (a) there are too many of them and (b) they usually cross the line and (c) despite what "GOON" taught us, they're not hilarious.

That said, the above was sent in by Zach G.

And quite boastful! Does he know Horny Rabbit?

Meanwhile, in Florida …

As you know, the Tampa Bay Lightning hand out Jersey Fouls to season ticket holders. Reader Scott Sages explains:

Yet you have to respect a man that loves 'MUF' so much that he'll digitally record it.

Jessica W.

writes in:

Instead, it's "Flamesuck," which is grammatically incorrect.

Unless, of course, he's simply trying to express that only one of the Flames sucks, in which case we'll just assume this is a Matt Stajan Tribute Sweater.

And finally …

Reader Joy writes on this Carolina Hurricanes Foul:

Oh, that's not a reason to be afraid. The hundreds of "Faulk This" sweaters, on the other hand …