ITF president says hefty fine - not ban - likely for Serena over US Open tirade

REGGIO CALABRIA, Italy - Top-ranked Serena Williams will receive a hefty monetary fine but will not be suspended for her U.S. Open tirade, the president of the International Tennis Federation believes.

Grand Slam administrator Bill Babcock is due to hand his recommendation to the Grand Slam committee, which will likely announce the sanction Monday or Tuesday.

"I don't think (an Australian Open ban) would make much sense, because it would penalize the people handing out the punishment," Francesco Ricci Bitti told The Associated Press on Saturday. "For the Grand Slam committee to exclude her from a Grand Slam doesn't seem likely."

The Grand Slam committee is composed of Ricci Bitti and the four Grand Slam presidents.

Williams was fined US$10,000 after her profanity-laced, finger-pointing outburst at a lineswoman during her semifinal loss to Kim Clijsters in September. An eventual fine from the ITF could be much greater.

"A significant financial penalty makes much more sense. But it has to be significant enough for the fans (to appreciate) it," Ricci Bitti said. "Of course it may not be significant for Serena Williams, who earns tens of millions."

By winning the season-ending tour championship last weekend, Williams set the record for single-season prize money in women's tennis by topping $6.5 million in 2009. Her career prize money is now at a record $28.5 million.

Ricci Bitti spoke at the Fed Cup final between the United States in Italy, which Williams and her sister Venus skipped.

The ITF president is also involved in a request by the World Anti-Doping Agency to investigate Andre Agassi's recent admission that he took crystal meth in 1997.

Agassi wrote in his soon-to-be-released autobiography "Open" that he ingested the drug and then lied to the ATP to avoid a suspension after failing a doping test.

Ricci Bitti is also a member of WADA's executive committee.

"The WADA code is our reference point and in every doping case the rules are quite clear. There is an eight-year period for sanctions to apply," Ricci Bitti said. "In terms of the regulations, there is nothing that can be done because we're past the eight-year period. It's more upsetting than anything else - for our sport and for the players."

Still, Ricci Bitti noted that the ATP should have a dossier on the case.

"We'll see what happens," he said.

In another drug-related case, the ITF confirmed a one-year suspension for Belgian tennis players Yanina Wickmayer and Xavier Malisse on Saturday. The duo was suspended by a Belgian tribunal this week for failing to report their whereabouts to anti-doping officials three times during 2009.

"This reminds me of the cases of Italian players involved in betting a little while ago," Ricci Bitti said. "These players need to be aware of their responsibilities. If they don't know, this is the result.

"These cases create discussion because they're not reliant on positive tests, but there are rules to respect," Ricci Bitti added. "We're awaiting the details from the Belgian federation. These kids need to wake up. They're professionals and they earn a lot of money. They don't need to merely know the rules, they should also respect them."

8 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. NaDine
    8. Posted by NaDine Tue Nov 17 1:51pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I'm not surprised they are going to look to fine her more money. I believe the most they can fine her is to take away all her money from the US Open. What I don't understand is why it's taking 3 months to make the decision. Bottom line is the decision makers aren't going to ban her from the Grand Slams -- that would be a surprise -- because that would cost them money. I remember one US Open a few years back, the only Americans left in the tournament where Venus and Serena and they where the best. Had it not been for them, TV ratings would have been down as well as attendance at the events. They are not going to cut off their noses to spite their faces by banning Serena. This would cost them millions of dollars. Also, it's not a matter of race whether being fined and suspended. I guess they wanted to make Serena sweat by taking so long to make a decision and review all the legal ramifications before doing so. And yes, she could appeal any decision that is made.
  2. <i>wilksdarrell</i>
    7. Posted by wilksdarrell Sun Nov 15 7:30am EST

    Report Abuse

    All i'm saying is just let that lovely woman Serena enjoy the game she loves with out all that talk about what she has.
  3. <i>wilksdarrell</i>
    6. Posted by wilksdarrell Sun Nov 15 7:03am EST

    Report Abuse

    why said because Serena makes millions it won't Serena,maybe not .But is 'n it about the money for you.
  4. curtis
    5. Posted by curtis Fri Nov 13 6:35pm EST

    Report Abuse

    i agree with richard m,what he said make sense,but the [wta] don't have any sense.they are haters i feel sorry for them.
  5. curtis
    4. Posted by curtis Fri Nov 13 6:35pm EST

    Report Abuse

    i agree with richard m,what he said make sense,but the [wta] don't have any sense.they are haters i feel sorry for them.
  6. randy
    3. Posted by randy Mon Nov 9 2:18pm EST

    Report Abuse

    to fbserver...
    race has nothing to do with this.......if they ban her, american women tennis is done
  7. FBSERVER
    2. Posted by FBSERVER Mon Nov 9 12:45pm EST

    Report Abuse

    If she was white, she would have been suspended and fined.
  8. Richard M
    1. Posted by Richard M Sun Nov 8 5:17pm EST

    Report Abuse

    They shuold be no two punishments for one crime. u do not detain some one before investigations
    SERENA was fined $10 000. no two fines for a crime. the problem here is not SERENA`s millions as u said but really what is at stake. She worked so hard for her millions, i feel that a warning is the right thing now.
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account