WTA Tour says player withdrawals down by 1 third
DOHA, Qatar (AP)—The WTA Tour’s new scheduling system with fewer mandatory tournaments has caused withdrawals to drop by more than one third this season.
The tour has also withstood the global financial crisis, with attendance and prize money up significantly for top events, chief executive Stacey Allaster said Sunday.
Allaster, the former WTA president who took over as chairman and CEO in July, said the tour’s so-called “roadmap” implemented this year has been “a fantastic success.”
The tour lowered the number of non-Grand Slam tournaments top players must enter from 13 to 10 and extended its offseason by two weeks. As a result, Allaster said, player withdrawals from top events is down 34 percent compared to last year.
Meanwhile, attendance was up 11 percent for premier tournaments in 2009, and prize money increased by 34 percent despite the tough economic climate.
“If we don’t have healthy athletes, we can’t have a level of product that we want,” Allaster said on the last day of the season-ending Sony Ericsson Championships, where Serena Williams defeated sister Venus in the final.
“That’s why it was important in the roadmap that we scheduled breaks. That is why there is a long break after Wimbledon, so they can take a rest after that grind.”
The longer offseason is also meant to give players more time to recover.
“We have two more weeks for them,” Allaster said. “They have two good months that they can have a good break.”
Still, it was evident that the long season has taken a toll on the players.
The Doha tournament, which featured the top eight women in the world, saw top-ranked Dinara Safina retire in her first match with a serious back injury, and No. 4 Caroline Wozniacki had to quit in her semifinal against Serena Williams.
Victoria Azarenka retired in the third set of her last round-robin mach on Friday, and alternate Vera Zvonareva pulled out after playing one match.
Wozniacki led the tour with 65 wins this season, in addition to playing for Denmark in the Fed Cup.
“Caroline Wozniacki played over 90 matches this year. That’s a lot of play,” Allaster said. “She, I’m sure, will be relooking at her schedule and the level of play that she can have.”
The players in Doha have been overwhelmingly positive about the shorter schedule.
“Comparing to the men’s tour, our schedule is much better,” third-ranked Russian Svetlana Kuznetsova said. “They still have two or three more weeks to go. It’s crazy because you don’t get time to rest and don’t get time to have good preparation before next season. For us, it’s so much different, so much better.”
Some challenges still remain for WTA officials. The tour’s main sponsor Sony Ericsson has yet to decide whether to renew its $88 million contract that expires at the end of the year.
Aldo Liguori, Sony Ericsson’s head of public relations, said he was impressed by the increased interest in the Doha tournament but wouldn’t reveal anything about future sponsorship.
“We still have a little bit of time left,” Liguori said. “I can certainly confirm we are looking at it very carefully. … We haven’t made any decision yet, and all options are open.”
The next step of the WTA’s roadmap is increasing the number of tournaments that are held together with the men’s ATP tour. In 2011, the annual tournaments in Rome and Cincinnati will feature men and women playing at the same time.
“We can all see the success of tennis when it’s combined,” she said. “We do know that combined events are a great strategy. Six of our top events in 2011 will be combined.”
- Soderling tops Djokovic, makes ATP semis
- Soderling continues strong play at ATP finals, beating Djokovic in straight sets
- Federer reclaims year-end No. 1 ranking
- Federer beats Murray, secures year-end No. 1 ranking for fifth time
- Rafael Nadal again loses to Robin Soderling, falling in 2 sets in round robin at ATP Finals
- Ex-USTA CEO Kantarian made $9M in 2008
- Federer back on top of tennis world after claiming year-end No. 1 ranking
- Chang: Asian men need better coaching
- Nadal to play in Spain's Davis Cup final
- Roddick: Knee injury coming along well
- Djokovic rallies to beat Davydenko in ATP finals
- Federer rallies to beat Verdasco in 3 sets in opening match at ATP finals

8 Comments
1 - 8 of 8
Report Abuse
wait and see
and it won't be on the WTA side alone
Federer won't show up at tournaments unless it's the Australian Open;Roland Garros;Wimbledon or the USO
Miami
Indian Wells
Madrid
Rome
Monte Carlo
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I've seen plenty of bad behavior from tennis players with less consequences, and I've seen the men get away with a lot worse. For instance, Marat Safin should be flat broke for paying fines for racket and officiating abuse. In a tournament earlier this year, he called the chair umpire a f&*ing d!ck head, told him he didn't know what he's talking about, and then insulted the tournament director on court in front of the crowd. All he got was a laugh and a wave of the hand. If there were any other consequences, nothing was ever talked about.
And you're probably right, WTA members might cast their vote to have Serena suspended but not because of her bad behavior but because they would have a better chance of winning the Australian Open, assuming that's the tourney from which she's suspended.
Plenty of women have exhibited bad behavior on the courts without the burden of having people call for continued public humiliation (Maria Martinez Sanchez cheated. She knew the ball hit her. Justine Henin cheated. She knew that she called time and then wouldn't acknowledge it. Horrible officiating in the 2006 U.S. Open led to the use of replay, just to name a few instances. And all these infractions were instances where these people cheated Serena. Where there any fines? Investigations? Media frenzies? I doubt it) . And again, the men get away with offensive behavior all the time. When Federer was cursing the chair umpire during the 2009 U.S. Open, Dick Enberg who was one of the commentators for the match, dismissed Federer's foul language as not being "venemous" and Mary Carillo called out Enberg, by pointing out that "he's cussing". Federer was fined $5,000.
In this instance, I think a lot of the outcry against Serena is sexist -- that it's okay for men to behave a certain way, but women should just be cute in their little tennis skirts, always be in control of their emotions and always be delicate, dainty and lady-like. If you are passionate, have a competitive spirit, are In the heat of battle, and have been cheated numerous times, emotions are bound to take over and that's probably what happened at the U.S. Open. Both foot faults were called at really critical times in the match and I could see, in light of the history of cheats and bad calls, why Serena would be angry.
Why can't you just let it go and be satisfied that so much has been made of this incident that it will likely not happen again? If it does, then a suspension might be warranted -- as long as EVERYONE is being held to the same standard. I was there. I paid good money for my ticket and waited for two days in the rain and cold to see that semi-final. I would have loved to have seen it played down to the final point because we have all seen Serena come back from the dead in a match that seemed hopelessly lost. It didn't happen and by the time I got home I was over it. I'm sure you've been less than perfect in your life and have been forgiven for an ugly moment or two. Why not play it forward?
Report Abuse
I had my celebrating during the week, because I new Serena was going to win the trophy. I did not watch the match, because I was at the gym. But thanks for asking. I wish all the players a speedy recovery for 2010, they all need a well deserved break.
Report Abuse
The "no history" statement is what you use to determine how lenient if at all you are on the consequences/punishment. It does not excuse the behavior which is exactly what posters use the "no history" comment for. It's the equivalent of saying "It's okay Serena we understand you only did it this once and you've never act this way. Plus that foolish line judge deserves it for you to act this way"... I hope no one really thinks like this...
While I don't think you do or can do anything further to Serena on this issue (despite that she'd fully deserve it), you simply can't retroactivate a new ruleset (well they could I guess, but shouldn't do so). However, you definately go and get a new rule instituted to prevent this from happening again, IF "tennis" doesn't want the women to act this way. IMO, They need to err on the side of line judges to avoid being afraid to make calls (aka do their job - right or wrong). You can bet that line judges will now just not make any close calls in a Serena match from now on. I hope no call on that close out ball doesn't matter.
Report Abuse
You people never give up. Serena Williams never deserved a suspension for her outburst during the U.S. Open. A bigger fine perhaps, but that was not the rule that was in place at the time, and you can't retroactively penalize someone after the fact. Serena does NOT have a history of this type of behavior, and this outburst is not at all typical for her, as even her harshest critics will attest. So, all of you haters STILL screaming " off with her head" really need to get over yourselves and your manufactured outrage.
However, I do agree with you on point. If the WTA locker room was polled, they would definitely want Serena gone. But not for the reasons you mean. They would want her gone, so that they would have more of a chance at some big titles, since Serena has done such a great job of denying them those opportunities, the most recent being the WTA Championship. It took her 15 years, but she finally gave you dummies a true bone to gnaw on. Unfortunately for you, the WTA is not stupid enough to get rid of one their biggest draws because of one foolish, uncharacteristic mistake. Morons.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
All the players know the fine was a joke. It sent the wrong message. You can essentially do or say whatever you want and it might cost you the equivalent of one day's shopping at Harrod's.
The WTA could easily do a blind survey of all their members in less than a week. I'd make a sizable wager that the tour members would cast their votes for Serena's suspension. As well they should.
1 - 8 of 8