Busted Racquet - Tennis

Andre Agassi deserves every bit of the criticism he is receiving for using crystal methamphetamine and misleading authorities to weasel his way out of a positive doping test result. He has added to the growing disillusionment many have with stars who once were admired without hesitation.

However, Agassi does not deserve the criticism from players and outsiders who question his right to open up about the past. Rather, Agassi should be admired for revealing a dark secret he could have taken to his grave.

Athletes are ripped for refusing to address the past (e.g. Mark McGwire), but now also for revealing every painful detail?

Can't have it both ways. Someone should tell that to the players.

"To me it seems terrible," Rafael Nadal said. "Why is he saying this now that he has retired?"

Martina Navratilova's response was even harsher. It was "not as much shock that he did it," she suggested, "as shock he lied about it and didn't own up to it. He's up there with Roger Clemens, as far as I'm concerned. He owned up to it (in the book), but it doesn't help now."

Someone needs to brief Martina. Last time we checked, Mr. Clemens hasn't owned up to, well, anything, and probably never will.

Roger Federer -- who also joined in the criticism -- Nadal and, to some extent, the retired Navratilova depend on the sport's credibility for their livelihood. When that credibility is damaged -- and Agassi definitely left tennis with a black eye -- they are also damaged, and it's never clear what consequences will follow. That scares them.

It shouldn't. Nadal needs to have more faith in the fans. Fans don't assume the whole sport is dirty because of how one player behaved. They don't think it's totally clean, either. No sport is.

The sport will survive. If anything, Agassi's revelations may help tennis and its players. There will be those players in the future, facing pressures only they can understand, who might now avoid making the numerous mistakes he made. That is how we learn, not by keeping the truth hidden.

A player's parents may learn, too, that treating their talented son or daughter the way Agassi's father allegedly did may work in the short term on the court, but could harm them in life more than they could ever imagine.

It doesn't mean we should rush to give Agassi the Pulitzer or forgive his actions. He is no saint for coming clean. But he is no villain, either. He is, when you strip away the talent and packaging, a flawed man who is sharing those flaws.

Fans can appreciate that.

Some may suggest Agassi's reputation will never be the same and that he should have thought about the ramifications before confessing.

Of course he thought about them. Agassi is a bright guy. But it's clear his main motivation was not keeping up his reputation. If he was going to tell his story, he was going to tell it straight. Agassi wasn't interested in providing the sanitized version to ensure future marketability.

Incidentally, athletes generally aren't condemned for selling jeans or deodorant or cars. Why are books different? Books, at least, offer insight and introspection.

Agassi's book and the negative publicity it generated may hurt him, but how Agassi conducted himself on the court once he grew past the juvenile behavior in his teens and early 20s is how he'll be remembered.

For his legendary battles with his top rival, Pete Sampras. He showed class, in victory and defeat. Especially in defeat.

For being the first American since Don Budge to capture all four majors. Not even Sampras accomplished that feat.

For the superb conditioning that allowed him to compete into his mid-30s when many of his peers were long gone from the game.

For the wonderful charity work he has done over the years. He has given away millions, more than the vast majority of athletes. Nobody ever forced him to do that.

That's how Agassi will be remembered. Or should be.

And now for having the courage to deal with the most sensitive subject imaginable -- himself -- and not ignoring the truth, even when the truth is ugly as it often is.

digg delicious
more

124 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. cb
    1. Posted by cb Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:20 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    He deserves every bit of criticism he gets -- How dare he lie to all of us -- and most improtantly expect us to be OK that he has come clean years later in a BOOK that he plans to make a profit from. Give me a break -- Everyone rode Serena for her outburst like she was public enemy number 1 -- she was wrong and had apologized several times, but people are still calling for her to have further reprimands. I am sick of this double standard -- he deserves criticism. And dont insult my intelligence by talking about your ephiphany in a $39.95 book.
    Puhlease!!!
  2. Douglas H
    2. Posted by Douglas H Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:42 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I actually have more respect for Agassi now. Doesn't change my love for tennis one bit. In fact, I think it keeps tennis in the spotlight - which is good.
  3. raj04m
    3. Posted by raj04m Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:43 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    The respect that he gained over the period while playing tennis is diminished. Why come clean now... What is the purpose ? Do not understand as why should he be admired ? Admired that he took meth and waited a full 10 years to come clean ? Blah ... give us a break.
  4. ugachuga
    4. Posted by ugachuga Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:51 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Agassi is to Serena as to CNN is to News
  5. anon
    5. Posted by anon Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:53 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    The book is only $15 on Amazon, and do you think it's all going into his pockets to be used to buy a private island for himself? How much of his earnings do you think he has poured into his charity? Let me tell you something, Agassi has done more for black kids than Venus and Serena ever have. His book would have sold anyway regardless of his revelation. He could have left it out and it would have still gone to #1. He already had a compelling story, the MOST compelling story in the history of tennis. It was already going to be a great read. And not only is his story of being a teen prodigy pummeled by his father, rising to the top, falling down, then coming back again an amazing story in itself, but Agassi is probably the BEST analyst of tennis out there right now. No one is better than him at analyzing a person's game, and he's played against almost all the greats in history that you've heard of. It would be an amazing read just for his analysis. He didn't need to reveal these things to sell a book, he did it because he felt it was the right thing to do. He was a troubled person for a long period of his life and he needed to open up about that. Give the man a break.
  6. dkgd
    6. Posted by dkgd Thu Nov 05, 2009 6:54 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Confessing, even in a book is ok. I agree with Arkush that confession is not a sin. I also do not think the confession was done for profit. Agassi is undoubtedly generous with time and money so he is not a greedy person. But Arkush is dead-wrong if he thinks this somehow helps the sport by teaching other players about drug use. It is absolutely the opposite. Players who would try to live up to the standard of the greats have seen that standard lowered. The biggest problem with the prevalence of drugs in sports is that it influences others at all levels. By admitting the use of drugs, there is no way that the sport will be cleaner in the future - rather we will see more drug use going forward.
    I said Agassi isn't greedy. But he is selfish. His confession clears his own conscience at the expense of the sport.
  7. Tijana
    7. Posted by Tijana Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:00 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Drugs are completely opposite to the meaning of the sport, but what makes difference is to tell the truth even tough it is hard as it was for Agassi. I`m surprised that anyone asked why he`s telling now? He`s setting up an pioneer example for his colleagues, revealing the darks side of the sport and pressure that sportsmen are bearing with, also showing that lying is useless and that you`ll want to have a clear conscience at the end. He could stay quiet till the end of his life and he would stay one of the best tennis players ever, worshiped by people. He had chosen to tell the truth. That`s the fair play and that`s what really sportsmen do.
  8. test
    8. Posted by test Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:05 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I did not like Agassi that much before. I always thought he has a little bit of thie ruthlessness. Now, I have a lot more respect for him. It takes great courage to do what he did.
    Go Agassi!
  9. anon
    9. Posted by anon Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:08 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    You know what, Agassi truly is a pioneer in humanizing the sport. Tennis has often been a sport of robots, seemingly perfect players who say the same things in interviews over and over again, offer no insight into their lives, and just go through the same routine every day. Agassi first pioneered by making it a standard for great players to form charitable foundations. Look at Sampras, where's his foundation? I read a lot of comments of people praising Sampras and bashing Agassi, but I've always seen Sampras as the selfish one who only talks about himself and cares about himself. Behind the scenes, Sampras cursed like a sailor and was very arrogant. Agassi was the more human of the two, and of course, has the more human story in his book. He pioneered the proper way for a player to thank the crowd, with absolute genuine love and thankfulness. He pioneered the way to stay in the game against all odds and through unbearable pain. He didn't just retire a match when his back started to hurt, or take a thousand injury time-outs, he played on and let his opponent earn the victory. He pioneered the proper way to retire and give a speech. Now he's pioneering the proper way to write an autobiography. You don't just write about how great you are, you put EVERYTHING on the table. All your faults, all your mistakes, everything.
  10. JohnL
    10. Posted by JohnL Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:08 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Agassi has become an "open book" so he can sell books. IF he is so damned honest, why didn't he come clean years ago. Could it be because he didn't have a book to sell?
  11. anon
    11. Posted by anon Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:13 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Could it be because he wanted to take a few years to get his thoughts and insights together and write the 400 page book properly, dumbass?
  12. jeanwsmith54
    12. Posted by jeanwsmith54 Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:28 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I disagree with the person who says that Andre is courageous for owning up to what he did. Courage is owning up to you actions despite devastating consequences. Courage doesn't have a profit sign attached it, or it shouldn't. Courage isn't writing about you deviant behavior years earlier in a book to make yet another dollar, and that seems to be what he is doing, Yet again isn't that the typical behavior of the "rich and famous" today- screwup and then sell their memoirs? If we are going to show Agassi mercy, then the media needs to show some of that same forgiveness to Chris Brown and others who have been castigated for misbehavior over the years.
  13. George Z
    13. Posted by George Z Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:30 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    ok, i dont like the fact that agassi did what he did, but he should be remember as an awesome tennis player and get into the tennis hall of fame
  14. s2kreno
    14. Posted by s2kreno Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:46 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Not a whole lot of intelligence to insult, CB.
  15. Robert
    15. Posted by Robert Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:47 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I totally agree with you Mr. Arkush. He was wrong that he lied about his drug use some 12 years ago. He was totally wrong that he did it in the first place. But it seems, all the positive and good things that he did for the sport, a sport which was in itself in the doldrums before the emergence of Andre Agassi (which you cannot really say of his peers in the Fab Five: Pete Sampras, Jim Courier, Michael Chang and Todd Martin), are now being totally ignored and forgotten just because Agassi wanted to come clean in his book.
    Agassi placed the tennis sport back in the sports map; he has a preparatory school for out-of-school youth; he was the first modern-day player to achieve the Grand Slam (something which even Sampras failed to achieve), the only male player with the Golden Slam: 4 Grand Slams and Olympic Gold (something which Roger Federer has also failed to achieve); he wasthe first man to achieve the Grand Slam in 4 different surfaces, etc., etc. It seems these are forgotten just because of one confession that he didn't really need to make in the first place but propriety warrants.
    And you're totally correct about the remarks made by Federer, Rafael Nadal and even Martina Navratilova. It seems they don't have their own mistakes and as if they're all totally clean and infallible that they cannot do drug use. Go tell that to the marines.
    Thank you Andre Agassi for saving the sport that is tennis. Thank you for being a humanitarian.
  16. maestra93
    16. Posted by maestra93 Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:53 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Federer did NOT dump on Agassi... Federer reminded people of what Agassi has done for charities since his retirement. Please do not lump Fed in with the mindless like Nadal and Navratilova.
  17. JimV
    17. Posted by JimV Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:53 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    yes, damn you agassi for leading me to believe that was your real hair!!!!
    hey, who the f*ck cares if he used crystal meth? he didn't cheat. what he does with his private life is his business. athletes are not role models. they are entertainers. get over it, america.
  18. pete'sbest14
    18. Posted by pete'sbest14 Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:05 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    #9 anon
    Wow! What did Pete ever do TO you? Or for that fact what has Andre ever done FOR you?
    FIrst of all, you have no idea what you are talking about regarding Pete being arrogant! That label is ALWAYS put on people who are quiet, not flashy, more introverted. Why is that, exactly? He wanted to show up, play his game and be the best he could be..he just HAPPENED to have won a few titles along the way~
    So Pete cussed like a sailor, hummm, well, I only heard him say a couple of words a couple of times, but hey, let's just nail him to that cross right now, what say you? Is that it?
    The worst you can say about him? He cursed and he preferred being to himself and quiet, WHOA, call the press!!! News flash here!!!
    Why do you think just because Pete's personality was one way and Andre's the polar opposite, is a BAD thing?
    No one is making any issue of personality types here! No anon, this is about illegal drug use as a professional athlete THEN lying to cover up and avoid being punished!!! It's really very clear.
    Now, back to the cursing part..what part of THAT, exactly, makes him a cheat and liar????
    Please reconcile the two for me..
    And please tell me, all of us, exactly how Andre was the TRUE pioneer of tennis!!!! I am dying to know!
    What about those two Americans named, Ashe & King (oh yeah, she's done NOTHING for tennis!!!!!) Have you even checked about Ash's Foundation & the HUGE amount of work his widow and foundation does for children and I don't even have time regarding Billy Jean's amazing contribution to this sport!!! These PIONEERS have their names galvanized in Tennis History and that's just two among many!!! Do you really think we'll see Andre's name on a stadium in NYC? I think not.
    Maybe not Pete's either, but so what?
    I am MOST interested in your information which leads you to believe that Pete has NO Charitable Foundations or causes!!!! Just because someone doesn't thump his chest and draw attention to it does not negate the validity of the fact.
    IF you can show me (and I dare say some others on this board) evidence that Pete is NOT involved with charitable causes I WILL STAND CORRECTED AND ADMIT YOU ARE RIGHT, on this ONE issue alone!
    So far as comparing Pete's career long gentility to Andre's there is no comparison, none. I won't compare records because those are a matter of record and that record might be different had Andre not lied and been punished as Pete may have won other slams in his absence. Pete's too classy to say that, but I surely will!
    And I was most eager to hear what you had to say about how Andre PIONEERED the ability to STAY IN THE GAME THROUGHOUT ALL ODDS, AMIDST GREAT PAIN!!!!!
    Holy cow fellow, do you know NOTHING about other tennis player's horrible pain-filled careers..and Pete's was one of the most courageous "on court" when playing under duress or in pain I've ever seen!!!
    I will allow my esteemed fellow posters fill in with the MANY details of how Pete played through matches when he was VERY sick. I'm not talking about just a back sprain, hip flexor, or riveting shoulder injury, I'm talking about playing with a disease he inherited from his Greek ancestors and lived with SILENTLY for the greater part of his life. Look it up! It's called Thalassemia. It's a very tough problem is you DON'T play tennis for a career and heat makes it much more debilitating. What was Andre's problem he suffered in silence about his entire career???
    I have tried to be fair and as kind as possible to Andre, out of respect for his stellar career, but you have drawn a line in the sand calling Pete names and saying his worth to tennis was not as great as Andre's!
    You are just out and out wrong, in my humble opinion~
    Have a nice day and do some homework before you post again about Pete!
  19. javasarala
    19. Posted by javasarala Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:09 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    You reap what you sow.
    Why should he be treated any differently than any cheat ? What if you admitted that you cheated your way through an exam ? Shoudn't you have your degree ripped and your status stripped bare ? Just because he is a sportsman does not mean that somehow we all need to handle this bald eagle with kid gloves.
    He deserves what he is getting. True, it appears that his dad was a monster (as written by him, we don't know the other half of the story) but that does not mean you end up cheating the world with drugs and fake hair.
  20. halosix
    20. Posted by halosix Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:23 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I smoked pot in college over 20 years ago...arrest me!!! who cares!!! Like everybody here is a SAINT!!!! PLEASE SPARE ME!!! it didnt help him play better...it made him HIGH!!!
  21. Igor l
    21. Posted by Igor l Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:23 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    No he is not deserved criticism he deserved punishment,he won undeserved Grand Slams ,took it from people
    who could be deserve it a lot more then him(they didn't use drugs at least) .He was a punk still the same jerk as he used to be ,nothing changed he just 40 y.o jerk,(he understood without this scandal his book sale not going well, shame on him. Do not put his name even close to Pete Sampras name (the Great One or one of the Greatest tennis players of all time)..... Pete was better person ,better tennis player....period.
  22. SOB
    22. Posted by SOB Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:26 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    agassi coming forward is good what he did was not right never saw him tank a match never saw him show up for a tournament and cop out after the fist round like some others provided some of the best tennis played in his later years his work with school in vegas is one great example oh his character cant think of a sampress, martina, nadal benefit for others although they probally have some he was a great champion and reading about his father how he acted was sad best to andre in the future and thanks for the memories
  23. Tijana
    23. Posted by Tijana Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:44 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    And of course, I forgot – this is a very good article.
  24. s p
    24. Posted by s p Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:45 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    I'm sure the players are disappointed. This is someone that many of them admired and looked up to.
    And further more, I'm sure that Andre has learned well from other celebraties that scandal sells. These admissions will make the book sale. What would have been a handful of sales, will now be through the roof.
    I mean why would have people bought the book otherwise? To read about a player who was a rebel? Those stories have already been written. I say blah blah blah...who really gives a big poop. One would hope that he backs these admissions up with sending out the message that he did things wrong and not to follow those examples.
  25. Wildman805
    25. Posted by Wildman805 Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:01 pm EST

    Report Abuse

    GOOD for you AGASSI!!! There is nothing wrong with being honest and doing a biography off everything in your life. Who would read a book about how you WON ALL YOUR TITLES. A lot of AGASSI HATERS in here......I admire both SAMPRAS and AGASSI. They both kept the USA dominant for another decade as RODDICK has failed us. AGASSI did what he wanted his WAY. GOOD FOR HIM. BROOK SHIELDS hurt his life and GAME BIG TIME. We all have our LOWS and so he did a DRUG. Who the HELL has NOT. PUHHHLEASE!!!!! GET REAL people and all this MONEY he makes which is not much AFTER CUTS/TAXES...GOES WHERE??? His FOUNDATION for KIDS......AWESOME....A PERSON WHO GIVES BACK....You all give him HELL. NAVRATILOVA should come CLEAN about STEROIDS with her VEINS popping out not to mention she did DIFFERENT things as FETISHES for WOMAN. Who is SHE to KNOCK people. WHAT A POMPUS jerk who was OWNED by STEFFI GRAF!!!! She should take some DIGS baby. You are the MAN AGASSI and think MORE of you for being HONEST which MANY cannot have the HEART..COURAGE ...BALLS or whatever you call it. Federer and Nadal COME ON....JUST PLAY TENNIS!

Busted Racquet

Add to My Yahoo! RSS

Chris Chase

Busted Racquet is a tennis blog edited by Chris Chase. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Related Photo Gallery

Y! Sports Blogs

Yahoo! Sports Blog Recent Readers