Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:38 pm EST

Andre Agassi deserves every bit of the criticism he is receiving for using crystal methamphetamine and misleading authorities to weasel his way out of a positive doping test result. He has added to the growing disillusionment many have with stars who once were admired without hesitation.
However, Agassi does not deserve the criticism from players and outsiders who question his right to open up about the past. Rather, Agassi should be admired for revealing a dark secret he could have taken to his grave.
Athletes are ripped for refusing to address the past (e.g. Mark McGwire), but now also for revealing every painful detail?
Can't have it both ways. Someone should tell that to the players.
"To me it seems terrible," Rafael Nadal said. "Why is he saying this now that he has retired?"
Martina Navratilova's response was even harsher. It was "not as much shock that he did it," she suggested, "as shock he lied about it and didn't own up to it. He's up there with Roger Clemens, as far as I'm concerned. He owned up to it (in the book), but it doesn't help now."
Someone needs to brief Martina. Last time we checked, Mr. Clemens hasn't owned up to, well, anything, and probably never will.
Roger Federer -- who also joined in the criticism -- Nadal and, to some extent, the retired Navratilova depend on the sport's credibility for their livelihood. When that credibility is damaged -- and Agassi definitely left tennis with a black eye -- they are also damaged, and it's never clear what consequences will follow. That scares them.
It shouldn't. Nadal needs to have more faith in the fans. Fans don't assume the whole sport is dirty because of how one player behaved. They don't think it's totally clean, either. No sport is.
The sport will survive. If anything, Agassi's revelations may help tennis and its players. There will be those players in the future, facing pressures only they can understand, who might now avoid making the numerous mistakes he made. That is how we learn, not by keeping the truth hidden.
A player's parents may learn, too, that treating their talented son or daughter the way Agassi's father allegedly did may work in the short term on the court, but could harm them in life more than they could ever imagine.
It doesn't mean we should rush to give Agassi the Pulitzer or forgive his actions. He is no saint for coming clean. But he is no villain, either. He is, when you strip away the talent and packaging, a flawed man who is sharing those flaws.
Some may suggest Agassi's reputation will never be the same and that he should have thought about the ramifications before confessing.
Of course he thought about them. Agassi is a bright guy. But it's clear his main motivation was not keeping up his reputation. If he was going to tell his story, he was going to tell it straight. Agassi wasn't interested in providing the sanitized version to ensure future marketability.
Incidentally, athletes generally aren't condemned for selling jeans or deodorant or cars. Why are books different? Books, at least, offer insight and introspection.
Agassi's book and the negative publicity it generated may hurt him, but how Agassi conducted himself on the court once he grew past the juvenile behavior in his teens and early 20s is how he'll be remembered.
For his legendary battles with his top rival, Pete Sampras. He showed class, in victory and defeat. Especially in defeat.
For being the first American since Don Budge to capture all four majors. Not even Sampras accomplished that feat.
For the superb conditioning that allowed him to compete into his mid-30s when many of his peers were long gone from the game.
For the wonderful charity work he has done over the years. He has given away millions, more than the vast majority of athletes. Nobody ever forced him to do that.
That's how Agassi will be remembered. Or should be.
And now for having the courage to deal with the most sensitive subject imaginable -- himself -- and not ignoring the truth, even when the truth is ugly as it often is.
Busted Racquet is a tennis blog edited by Chris Chase. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.
Posted Nov 23 2009
Fantasy Football: Week 12 Waiver Wire Gems
Posted Nov 23 2009
World Cup coin minted at Soccer City
Posted Nov 23 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
124 Comments
1 - 25 of 124
Report Abuse
Puhlease!!!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I said Agassi isn't greedy. But he is selfish. His confession clears his own conscience at the expense of the sport.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Go Agassi!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Agassi placed the tennis sport back in the sports map; he has a preparatory school for out-of-school youth; he was the first modern-day player to achieve the Grand Slam (something which even Sampras failed to achieve), the only male player with the Golden Slam: 4 Grand Slams and Olympic Gold (something which Roger Federer has also failed to achieve); he wasthe first man to achieve the Grand Slam in 4 different surfaces, etc., etc. It seems these are forgotten just because of one confession that he didn't really need to make in the first place but propriety warrants.
And you're totally correct about the remarks made by Federer, Rafael Nadal and even Martina Navratilova. It seems they don't have their own mistakes and as if they're all totally clean and infallible that they cannot do drug use. Go tell that to the marines.
Thank you Andre Agassi for saving the sport that is tennis. Thank you for being a humanitarian.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
hey, who the f*ck cares if he used crystal meth? he didn't cheat. what he does with his private life is his business. athletes are not role models. they are entertainers. get over it, america.
Report Abuse
Wow! What did Pete ever do TO you? Or for that fact what has Andre ever done FOR you?
FIrst of all, you have no idea what you are talking about regarding Pete being arrogant! That label is ALWAYS put on people who are quiet, not flashy, more introverted. Why is that, exactly? He wanted to show up, play his game and be the best he could be..he just HAPPENED to have won a few titles along the way~
So Pete cussed like a sailor, hummm, well, I only heard him say a couple of words a couple of times, but hey, let's just nail him to that cross right now, what say you? Is that it?
The worst you can say about him? He cursed and he preferred being to himself and quiet, WHOA, call the press!!! News flash here!!!
Why do you think just because Pete's personality was one way and Andre's the polar opposite, is a BAD thing?
No one is making any issue of personality types here! No anon, this is about illegal drug use as a professional athlete THEN lying to cover up and avoid being punished!!! It's really very clear.
Now, back to the cursing part..what part of THAT, exactly, makes him a cheat and liar????
Please reconcile the two for me..
And please tell me, all of us, exactly how Andre was the TRUE pioneer of tennis!!!! I am dying to know!
What about those two Americans named, Ashe & King (oh yeah, she's done NOTHING for tennis!!!!!) Have you even checked about Ash's Foundation & the HUGE amount of work his widow and foundation does for children and I don't even have time regarding Billy Jean's amazing contribution to this sport!!! These PIONEERS have their names galvanized in Tennis History and that's just two among many!!! Do you really think we'll see Andre's name on a stadium in NYC? I think not.
Maybe not Pete's either, but so what?
I am MOST interested in your information which leads you to believe that Pete has NO Charitable Foundations or causes!!!! Just because someone doesn't thump his chest and draw attention to it does not negate the validity of the fact.
IF you can show me (and I dare say some others on this board) evidence that Pete is NOT involved with charitable causes I WILL STAND CORRECTED AND ADMIT YOU ARE RIGHT, on this ONE issue alone!
So far as comparing Pete's career long gentility to Andre's there is no comparison, none. I won't compare records because those are a matter of record and that record might be different had Andre not lied and been punished as Pete may have won other slams in his absence. Pete's too classy to say that, but I surely will!
And I was most eager to hear what you had to say about how Andre PIONEERED the ability to STAY IN THE GAME THROUGHOUT ALL ODDS, AMIDST GREAT PAIN!!!!!
Holy cow fellow, do you know NOTHING about other tennis player's horrible pain-filled careers..and Pete's was one of the most courageous "on court" when playing under duress or in pain I've ever seen!!!
I will allow my esteemed fellow posters fill in with the MANY details of how Pete played through matches when he was VERY sick. I'm not talking about just a back sprain, hip flexor, or riveting shoulder injury, I'm talking about playing with a disease he inherited from his Greek ancestors and lived with SILENTLY for the greater part of his life. Look it up! It's called Thalassemia. It's a very tough problem is you DON'T play tennis for a career and heat makes it much more debilitating. What was Andre's problem he suffered in silence about his entire career???
I have tried to be fair and as kind as possible to Andre, out of respect for his stellar career, but you have drawn a line in the sand calling Pete names and saying his worth to tennis was not as great as Andre's!
You are just out and out wrong, in my humble opinion~
Have a nice day and do some homework before you post again about Pete!
Report Abuse
Why should he be treated any differently than any cheat ? What if you admitted that you cheated your way through an exam ? Shoudn't you have your degree ripped and your status stripped bare ? Just because he is a sportsman does not mean that somehow we all need to handle this bald eagle with kid gloves.
He deserves what he is getting. True, it appears that his dad was a monster (as written by him, we don't know the other half of the story) but that does not mean you end up cheating the world with drugs and fake hair.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
who could be deserve it a lot more then him(they didn't use drugs at least) .He was a punk still the same jerk as he used to be ,nothing changed he just 40 y.o jerk,(he understood without this scandal his book sale not going well, shame on him. Do not put his name even close to Pete Sampras name (the Great One or one of the Greatest tennis players of all time)..... Pete was better person ,better tennis player....period.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
And further more, I'm sure that Andre has learned well from other celebraties that scandal sells. These admissions will make the book sale. What would have been a handful of sales, will now be through the roof.
I mean why would have people bought the book otherwise? To read about a player who was a rebel? Those stories have already been written. I say blah blah blah...who really gives a big poop. One would hope that he backs these admissions up with sending out the message that he did things wrong and not to follow those examples.
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 124