BC Appeal Court dismisses appeal by women ski jumpers to compete in 2010 Games
VANCOUVER, B.C. - Faith that Canada's charter would trump the Olympic charter was shattered Friday for a group of female ski jumpers fighting to be included in the 2010 Winter Olympic Games.
Faces graced with hopeful smiles during two days of hearings crumpled into tears when a three-judge panel of the B.C. Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed their case Friday.
The women were appealing a lower court ruling that allowed Games organizers to hold a men's ski jumping competition but not a women's event - something the women say violated their charter rights.
They had asked the courts for a declaration that VANOC must comply with the charter, meaning there either had to be events for both genders or none at all.
Vancouver organizers argued that because the decision not to include a women's event was made by the International Olympic Committee under the terms of its own charter, Canada's charter doesn't apply.
"I thought they would go the other way, for sure," said reigning world champion ski jumper, Lindsay Van, of Utah, as she wiped away tears after the decision.
"I thought we had a very good argument that was very much set and it didn't seem it would go the other direction."
Outside the court after the decision was announced, some of the women hugged one another for support.
Van said without a Games to aspire to, it's hard to predict what will happen to her sport.
"It's not any different than it was, we didn't lose anything, we just didn't gain anything," said Van.
"From here our sport just is stagnant, it doesn't go anywhere."
With the Games less than three months away, the B.C. Appeal Court made the ruling Friday afternoon, immediately after hearing two days of arguments.
The women could seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, but that process would take months. They could also ask the appeal court to suspend their ruling pending an appeal.
"I'm not going to commit to anything, but I think it's very late," said Ross Clark, the lawyer for the women.
The Appeal Court judges did not give reasons for their decision, and gave no timeline for releasing the reasons in written form.
Clark said he thought the appeal process was fair, and he didn't want to speculate on why his legal arguments failed to sway the judges.
Vancouver Games organizers said they were glad the process was over, but they were sad for the women.
"I don't like these kinds of days, we are first and foremost men and women of sport and we believe in athletics," said John Furlong, VANOC's chief executive officer.
"This is a matter that's been far from our reach and our influence and we simply didn't have any jurisdiction here … these girls have tried very hard, they have put up a very good fight."
VANOC pointed out that the organization has hosted and funded several women's ski jumping events since the Olympic facilities opened almost two years ago.
Calgary jumper Charlotte Mitchell said she was crushed by the decision, but it's not over.
"We did have a fair trial we think, we just can't give up, we've just got to keep fighting," Mitchell said.
The case raised questions about exactly who is in control of the Games. For the charter to apply, the body in question must be either a government agency or carrying out a government program.
The women had argued that the Games are a government activity.
But VANOC argued the government had no decision-making power over the Olympics, as that power rests solely with the IOC.
The international body voted in 2006 not to include women's ski jumping at the Games, saying the sport had not met the required technical criteria and to add them would violate elements of the Olympic charter that govern the operations of a Games.
Ski jumping is the only sport at either the Winter or Summer Games without events for both men and women since the IOC voted earlier this year to include women's boxing at the Summer Olympics.
Women's ski jumping will be on the program for the upcoming 2010 Youth Olympic Games and the international body that governs ski jumping has said they will press for its inclusion for the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi, Russia.
- Germans restore 1936 high jump record
- Covered outdoor skating rink in downtown Vancouver has been upgraded
- German skier Maria Riesch head and shoulders above competition at Olympic Games
- 49ers' Vernon Davis gets a broom and goes curling
- Norway axes American speedskating coach
- Brazil wins volleyball Grand Champions Cup
- Phelps looking ahead to better times in 2010
- Swimmers Lochte, Soni win athlete of year honors
- Cross country championships produce big surprises
- B.C. paramedics warn ongoing labour dispute could impact service during Olympics
- This curl has nothing to do with pass routes: 49ers' Davis tries curling
- Norway fires American speedskating coach
- Slight rise in construction cost of London Games
- Olympic torch makes its way across N.B.; helps open new stadium in Moncton
- The shameful case of Caster Semenya
- Women's judo pioneer Rena "Rusty" Kanokogi dies


216 Comments
1 - 25 of 216
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Do you like ski jumping? Well good for you, why don't you continue to do it then regardless of whether or not it's "recognized as a sport" by the IOC?
My SO could care less about this. She doesn't see why everyone is up in arms about this. So what? You can't compete, just continue to keep doing it by yourself or do they ban you from even going on the ramp? Once the sport gets more established and "brings in the money" I'm sure the IOC won't ignore it and disregard it much longer. Until then the athletes should just keep doing their thing regardless of if you can get a shiny medal or not.
Report Abuse
THE GUYS WHO WERE DECIDING IN THE TRIAL SAID:
"This is a matter that's been far from our reach and our influence and we simply didn't have any jurisdiction here … these girls have tried very hard, they have put up a very good fight."
THEY DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION. IF THESE WOMEN WANT IT TO CHANGE, PETITION TO THE IOC. WHY THE HELL WOULD THE BC PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT HAVE ANYYY JURISDICTION OVER THE OLYMPIC GAMES?
THE GOVERNMENT OF BC DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION.
That would be like the government of Ontario telling me that I am not allowed to, at my own private function, only allow people of one sex. THE GOVERNMENT HAS NO RIGHT TO SAY WHAT SPORTS ARE AND ARE NOT IN THE OLYMPICS, NOR WHICH GENDER SHOULD HAVE A TEAM IN WHICH.
THE GOVERNMENT OF BC DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION.
If these women had thought PROPERLY, they would petition the only governing body who actually controls anything to do with the olympics, and that is the IOC.
READ THE ARTICLE BEFORE YOU POST. DEAR GOD.
I'm going to repeat myself several times here so that you understand.
THE GOVERNMENT OF BC DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION.
THE GOVERNMENT OF BC DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION.
THE GOVERNMENT OF BC DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION.
THE GOVERNMENT OF BC DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION.
THE GOVERNMENT OF BC DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION.
THE GOVERNMENT OF BC DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
That is concerning, not having a group of whining woman denied the 'God given right' to compete in a non-existing Olympic discipline.
If they win and get to compete I will sue for the same reason and DEMAND in a new discipline called 'Synchronized spitting against the wind'. Why not? It might become an Olympic discipline based on Canadian legal system recommendation.
Report Abuse
Gee, I just bet employers are pounding down your door with job offers these days huh? Oh no wait, when you cant get a job it will have nothing to do with you suing your last 2 employers, it will be discrimination wont it, silly me what was I thinking, duh?
Report Abuse
Nothing more to say.
Comming from someone who was discriminated against twice within a year, and won both cases.
LADIES---- Keep up your fight.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
"A sport or discipline is included in the Olympic program if the IOC determines that it is widely practiced around the world, that is, the number of countries that compete in a given sport is the indicator of the sport's prevalence. The IOC's requirements reflect participation in the Olympic Games as well — more stringent toward men (as they are represented in higher numbers) and Summer sports (as more nations compete in the Summer Olympics). Sports may not depend primarily on mechanical propulsion, though there were power-boating events in the early days of the Olympics.[2] [9]".
Relax folks, women not having a chance to participate in a sport in the olympics is not death to human rights in Canada. Get a grip.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
All women should be absolutely ashamed of these women ski jumpers behaviour as well as some of the blogs on here. Some of the blogs are unbelievably repulsive. You're behaving worse then the worse man could ever act. You earn respect, you dont demand it; something several women on this blog fail to understand.
Report Abuse
This is similar to the Florida recount ruling, which said that yes it was illegal , for future reference, but that it was too late to do anything now!
Just plain wrong!
Report Abuse
that they are quite capable of competing in. I think this is a discrimination case and the Olympic
organizers should be ashamed. If women want to compete in ski jumping in the Olympics they
should be allowed.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
You know it was 't going to pass the judges,so just wait till 2012.
wa,wa,wa !!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 25 of 216