Fri May 30, 2008 9:34 am EDT

There's a certain mindset among some, but not all, Canadian hockey fans that the NHL universe contains six large planets and 24 moons that orbit around them. It's the kind of mindset that can literally alter unbalanced regular season schedules in order to get young superstars from the Eastern Conference shipped over to Western Canadian cities; the sort of thinking that feeds those nasty theories about how the NHL "needs Canadian team X" to succeed for the betterment of business, hockey and mankind in general. And, of course, it provides the fuel for arguments about placing more teams "nord of da border."
Well, according to ace sports business reporter Rick Westhead of The Toronto Star, it turns out some occasional egomania from Canadian hockey fans is completely warranted. Citing "a secret NHL report detailing the ticket revenues of its 30 teams," Westhead reveals that the Montreal Canadiens, Toronto Maple Leafs, Ottawa Senators, Edmonton Oilers, Calgary Flames and Vancouver Canucks account for "31 per cent of the $1.1 billion (U.S.) in league ticket revenue":
The increase in the value of the Canadian dollar may be responsible for as much as half of the league's revenue gains since the NHL went through the lockout of 2004-05, say several sources familiar with NHL finances."If you take out the Canadian teams, which have done so well since the lockout largely because of the Canadian dollar, the league's revenues are actually only growing at a 2 per cent clip per year," says an executive with a U.S.-based NHL team, who requested anonymity. "It's not enough. We're not really growing as a sport, and we're still invisible in the U.S."
The money quote comes from former Vancouver Canucks owner Arthur Griffiths: "This really makes the case for another team in Canada, whether it's Hamilton, Winnipeg or Quebec City." The question is whether that's going to be an expansion franchise or a relocated U.S. franchise. Westhead indentifies some teams lagging behind the Canadian franchises in ticket revenue:
In fact, eight U.S. teams - the Coyotes, the Florida Panthers, Chicago Blackhawks, New York Islanders, Atlanta Thrashers, Washington Capitals, Nashville Predators and St. Louis Blues - generated less than half the amount of ticket revenue this season of the Edmonton Oilers and Ottawa Senators. At $1.2 million in ticket revenue per game, the Oilers and Senators garnered the least amount of ticket money among Canadian clubs.
It's a great read and an important story, especially as potential NHL city Kansas City prepares to welcome hockey to its new arena this fall. Based on the numbers, can Las Vegas and Kansas City still claim their place in line ahead of cities like Winnipeg and Hamilton?
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Philadelphia 3, New Jersey 2 (Feb. 8)
Posted Feb 7 2010
San Jose 3, Toronto 2 (Feb. 8)
Posted Feb 7 2010
Phoenix 6, Edmonton 1 (Feb. 8)
Posted Feb 7 2010
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Brooks Peck
Edited by Andy Behrens
111 Comments
1 - 25 of 111
Report Abuse
Clarence Campbell was the last guy to do a good job as the head of the NHL.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Ah the stuff that dreams are made of !!!!!!!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Want to know why Winnipeg and Quebec lost their teams? Because the Canadian dollar was artificially held down to about $0.65USD.
Report Abuse
Aside from the original teams and teams located in the northern US, hockey is an after thought.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
When one of Bettman's expansion teams moves back to Canada that will be the ultimate indictment of Bettman's failed regime.
Personally the league should reduce by six teams.
That would solve a lot of the problems.
Report Abuse
I find it funny that you automatically thought I was an American.
Report Abuse
By the way, the numbers don't lie.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I didn't assume you were American I assumed you were not Canadian.
Mentioning Strip clubs Makes me think I'm still right.
Parti Québécois????????
Report Abuse
It's the size of the TV market. Advertising dollars and TV rights revenue is what drives where franchises are located. So in a city the size of Greater Atlanta, let's say 5 million, you only need 16% of the population (i know even that is a stretch, but just using the numbers) watching a hockey game to get the same market as if every single person in the Greater Quebec City market, with a population of 800,000, watched a game. It's just demographics and advertising dollars.
Professional sports teams do not make their real money from ticket revenue. The most successful teams take in about $1.5 million per game in gate sales - that's only about $61 million for 41 home games - and that's revenue NOT profit. Although it's a whole different universe, I have heard the NY Jets would make a profit just from their TV contract alone, even if not one fan paid to go to a single home game all year. Interesting.
So really it's the size of the surrounding Metro area, and the population the advertisers can reach (and of course the ratings) which is the most important aspect. It's NOT who previously had a team or which city can SUPPORT a team. Owners just like you to think that becuase they know you are a fan.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
A good question to pose, and I don't really know the regulations or restrictions behind it, but why doesn't NBC or Versus just pick up the CBC HNIC feed for games? Global TV in Canada picks up Fox feeds for the NFL Sunday games. CBC does a wayyy better job showing NHL games with better play by play and better camera angles.
I have many American friends near the border that can get CBC and they refuse to watch NHL on any of their regional Fox networks or the national NBC games. Maybe we could get a few more fans south of the border if they could watch the games on a quality broadcast that we (Canadians) can on CBC?
Comments?
Report Abuse
There is no profit sharing among NHL clubs or at least nothing like other leagues. The only semblance of profit sharing had to do with "currency equalization" payments a few years ago when the Canadian dollar was sitting about about $0.80.
So Gillette Jr. is not propping up any US franchises.
Lately there is more concern about the crippling municipal and federal tax structure for Canadian teams as they compete with, not only a more beneficial tax structure for US teams, but even tax CREDITS for some US teams. Ex. The Vancouver Canucks paid more in taxes as an organization last year than all US teams combined.
Report Abuse
As for the ignoramuses out there who are quick to slam Canada, guess where America gets most of its commodities (such as oil, natural gas, lumber, etc.). Yes, Canada. Sorry, you need us more than we need you.
Report Abuse
that hockey and basketball originated in Canada, we have no connection to them ...
We are hockey fans!
And the best things that could happen to hockey include 1. Buttman gone; 2. drop bottom six teams; 3. relocate next 6 to Canada; 4. drop 10 games from the regular season; 5. have all teams play all teams at least once; 6. and work with what you have rather than what you
want.
Hockey will never displace the big 3 in the US, but that doesn't mean there can't be a decent market for broadcasters ... hell, they put curling, darts, cricket, rugby, soccer, and golf on the sports channel and sell beer, they can do the same with hockey.
Buttman's only 'plan' has been expansion for the expansion fee ... but meanwhile he has let
salaries that should match football teams jump up to match those of basketball teams ... without the revenue! Hockey salaries are going to need another overhaul, but what else is new?
The good thing about dropping the bottom six is that whatever little 'talent' exists on those
teams would be spread around again ... there are only so many good hockey players and
putting the farm team on the ice isn't what people expect.
Repatriate Hockey!
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
All fine to say, but doesn't work with the economics of it. Owners don't move teams to Canada just to placate Canadian feelings.
Can you give me the names of the 6 additional Canadian cities you think could support an NHL team and have an ownership group able to handle the $250 million or so to purchase one?
Did you know that any owner that moves a team within two hours driving distance of another team has to pay a massive predatory fee? As an owner would you want to do that?
If Bettman was doing it just for expansion fees - who do you think benefitted from those fees?
It gets annoying just to have some emtional "hockey is Canada" conversation. There are cold hard economic reasons why the NHL is the way it is today. Let's address some of that.
Report Abuse
Citizens of Canada are Canadians with an "A". Canadiens with an "E" are a hockey team and also a French speaking ethnic group that originated in the 1800s of which the team is named after. Arguments and insults lose a little credibility when knowledge is lacking.
I really don't feel like getting into which country would exist without the other. But it is interesting your rationale for having Americans responsible for our healthcare. I'd be curious on that one!
1 - 25 of 111