Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:39 pm EDT
Frank Seravalli of the Philadelphia Daily News broke the news on his Twitter this morning that NHL Deputy Commissioner Bill Daly had informed him that Mike Richards(notes) would not face any discipline for his hit on David Booth(notes) of the Florida Panthers last night.
(Before any outrage about the decision is directed towards NHL Executive VP for Hockey Operations Colin Campbell, it should be noted that because his son Gregory was involved in the game as a member of the Panthers, he recused himself from the review process.)
Booth was taken to a local Philadelphia hospital where doctors would get a better understanding of his condition sometime today and how much time he could possibly miss.
Now, to the hit. The NHL wants to eliminate head shots from the game but with each controversial hit being treated differently, it's hard to tell if any progress is being made with these decisions. Should there be a true definition of a suspendable headshot in the NHL or will we have to rely on the policy being different on a case-by-case basis?
While it may not have been Richards' intent to strike Booth's head, that was the end result. It also wasn't the first time Richards laid a hit on an opposing player in that sort of fashion as we saw in 2005 with Atlanta's Ronald Petrovicky(notes):
As recently as March, the NHL and it's general managers were discussing head shots and while he may not have been part of this specific decision, Colin Campbell's personal opinion on the topic was certainly a factor in Richards not missing any time:
"The one they are talking about that I think is a real slippery slope is when you are asking the referee to call a shoulder hit that hits the face," Campbell says. "You're taking a vital aspect of the game out, in my own personal belief."
"I believe there is a responsibility by the player getting hit by a legal check that he has to have his head up and avoid it," Campbell said. "In my day, if you got hit that way, legally by a player, your teammates would wonder what was going on, your coach would look at you and maybe not say anything, but your dad for sure when you got home would give you crap for having your head down."
"I'm certainly concerned about player safety, but I'm more concerned about taking a play out of the game that is a good, physical part of the game."
Like Carolina Hurricanes GM Jim Rutherford said last year after watching Brandon Sutter(notes) take a shot to the head from Doug Weight(notes) of the New York Islanders, the NHL saying it's vigilant on hits to the head is one thing, but using the "part of the game" excuse in instances like this should be left behind as players get bigger, faster and stronger.
Puck Daddy is an NHL blog edited by Greg Wyshynski. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Ottawa 2, Columbus 1 (Nov. 26)
Posted Nov 25 2009
Vancouver 4, Los Angeles 1 (Nov. 26)
Posted Nov 25 2009
Chicago 7, San Jose 2 (Nov. 25)
Posted Nov 24 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens
346 Comments
1 - 24 of 346
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
If the NHL wants to implement a no-tolerance head shot policy like the NFL does for hitting quarterbacks, that's fine. But until that happens hits like this are allowed.
Report Abuse
One more thing. If Ovechkin ever did something like this we wouldn't hear the end of it from the likes of Don Cherry and ironically Flyers fans and players including Mr. Richards himself.
Report Abuse
Head shots should me an automatic 2 min penalty, accidental or otherwise with an automatic review by the league. The majority of the reviews will not require a suspension, but the automatic penalty will be in the back of the mind of players and shouldn't effect the game very much.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
I'm not even sure the play was interference. I would love to hear from the NHL on that, but I expect we'll never hear that one.
Report Abuse
Fail (on that point, I agree with the rest of your post entirely)
Watch the replays again. Mitchell (who is 2-3 inches taller than Toews) lands his shoulder squarely into Toews' chest. No headshot whatsoever. Not saying Richards' hit deserves a suspension but it did warrant a review for sure. Mitchell's hit did not warrant a review and even Mr. Overeacter himself (Joel Quenneville) did not complain about it. No one except some casual Hawks fans were screaming suspension (most die-hard Hawks fans, although wanting Mitchell equally leveled next game, accepted that the hit was clean)
Report Abuse
Wysh - how about putting this video in place of the CBC vid? Better quality, better sound, and you don't have to listen to that moron PJ Stock.
Report Abuse
So, new to the NHL I see. Welcome.
Report Abuse
In this case, I think you could make a case for "Intent to injure", but Interference was not the right call.
The hit trots the line of legality in some situations, but there's no perfect ruling. The NHL can MAKE that the case, but they need to make those changes.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
What a joke of a team.
Report Abuse
If you need to keep your head down to receive a pass or make a move, then maybe you need to do a little more stick handling training during practices.
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
Report Abuse
1 - 24 of 346