blaine the Saints are playing Detroit and St. Louis because they finished in the same position of their divisions last year. Yes we all know the Saints were terrible last year. Zacc, lets face it, the Saints blew it last year when they played the Vikings. A lot of things could have happened but the loss is what happened. Blaine don’t go to the bank this year on what happened last year. If we get to meet (more than likely in the championship) it will be a lot different due to both teams being a lot different this year. Robert, the Vikings should be over the Saints why exactly? You say we had close games. Lets not forget the Vikings beat Cleveland, Detroit twice, St. Louis, Green Bay twice San Francisco and Baltimore. How many of those were close games? One by 3, one by 7 and one by 2 not to mention the one you didn’t win. Lets find another way to justify why the Vikings should be ranked higher. Like the record of their opponents. Minnesota 29-52, Saints 33-50, close but the Saints are still on top. I know Minnesota outscored their opponents by 87 points that’s nice but the Saints outscored their by 134. I’m trying to help your case but I can’t. The only thing you can say is maybe the fact that Minnesota played Pittsburg, but they lost so that doesn’t say much more than maybe Pittsburg should be above Minnesota. I don’t know, maybe you should try cause right now your argument isn’t holding much water. If it’s by 1 point or 49 the outcome of the game is still the same so lets not go claiming everyone is better because the Saints are WINNING by less than 10. Saints, Saints, Saints
HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY?
Robert, the Vikings should be over the Saints why exactly? You say we had close games. Lets not forget the Vikings beat Cleveland, Detroit twice, St. Louis, Green Bay twice San Francisco and Baltimore. How many of those were close games? One by 3, one by 7 and one by 2 not to mention the one you didn’t win. Lets find another way to justify why the Vikings should be ranked higher. Like the record of their opponents. Minnesota 29-52, Saints 33-50, close but the Saints are still on top. I know Minnesota outscored their opponents by 87 points that’s nice but the Saints outscored their by 134. I’m trying to help your case but I can’t. The only thing you can say is maybe the fact that Minnesota played Pittsburg, but they lost so that doesn’t say much more than maybe Pittsburg should be above Minnesota. I don’t know, maybe you should try cause right now your argument isn’t holding much water. If it’s by 1 point or 49 the outcome of the game is still the same so lets not go claiming everyone is better because the Saints are WINNING by less than 10.
Saints, Saints, Saints