Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:40 pm EST
OK, this does move around a bit, so let's try to keep up.
Tim Duncan(notes)? In. Andrew Bogut(notes)? Out. Michael Redd(notes)? Out. Manu Ginobili(notes)? Out. Tony Parker(notes)? In. Luc Mbah a Moute? Out, possibly. Richard Jefferson(notes)? In, with the Spurs.
Brandon Jennings(notes)? So, so in.
This could be a pretty solid matchup. The Spurs haven't been up to their usual stuff defensively this year, but they have been able to put points on the board. The Bucks have been stellar defensively since the outset, and though losing Bogut will hurt them in that area, replacement pivots Dan Gadzuric(notes) and Kurt Thomas(notes) are hardly slouches in that area.
Just four games tonight, including a trip to Portland for the Bulls, and a pair of lesser pairings (Kings and Grizzlies, Clippers and Timberwolves) that are bound to put NBA basketball back at least a decade. Which would be fine by me, because I'd be in better shape, and I didn't mind using a 28.8k connection.
Comment away, cats.
Milwaukee Bucks: 8-3, 94.3 possessions per game (11th-most in the NBA), 104.9 points scored per 100 possessions (19th), 99.2 points allowed per 100 possessions (second).
San Antonio Spurs: 5-6, 90.3 possessions per game (27th), 109.5 points scored per 100 possessions (fifth), 106.9 points allowed per 100 possessions (17th).
All statistics courtesy basketball-reference.com.
Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:40 am EST
This loss is on Al Harrington.
OK, an open shot that turned into the game-winning shot ... that's on Al Harrington. The near-win for the Knicks was almost on Harrington, but, let's be dramatic. It's November, after all. Crunch time. Every game counts.
So, THIS LOSS IS ON AL HARRINGTON!
David Lee is supposed to shade and follow Paul Pierce, who had scored 33 points in the win and has hit more game-clinching shots than I can remember. Kevin Garnett is Lee's man, but with less than two seconds to go, you help your teammate follow Pierce on a screen-and-roll.
Harrington is supposed to move over to Garnett because K.G. can't get a pass off, and K.G. can't set up another teammate to get a shot off 20 feet away with less than two seconds to go in overtime.
Al was slow to recover, though, and Garnett hoisted a jumper with about a second to go, from where he'd hit a few minutes earlier in the game (despite going 4 for 15 at that point), and the C's won. It's not much to be proud of, on the road against a three-win team in overtime, but Boston will take it.
Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:50 pm EST
It could be a three-game night, or it might be a 10-game night. Doesn't matter. Actually, it is a 10-game night. Has no bearing on this. The Magic and Celtics are playing, and you need to watch.
You don't have to do it in real time. It's a Friday night, and someone might want to shower your foyer with rose pedals before feeding you stroganoff. Doesn't matter, tape the darn thing. Watch it tomorrow. Understand that it might go a long way toward giving you an understanding of what goes on in May. These two could go seven next spring, and you're going to want to know why.
You're also going to want to watch it because Orlando and Boston are two highly entertaining teams, squads that shoot well, play D, run the floor when appropriate, while slamming it home or working the baseline reverse scoop while inappropriate.
What else are you going to do? Mess with the head of some wrong number that keeps texting you? Not that this is wrong or anything, but leave the kid alone. They're scared.
10 games tonight. The Blazers are in Oakland to take on the Warriors, Houston and Atlanta will be a killer, Cleveland and Indiana will remind of glorious autumn evenings in the Midwest, Miami and Toronto makes no sense (weren't the Raptors just in Denver?), and Washington and the Oklahoma City Thunder feels like a spring training game between an American and National League team that would never meet in the World Series.
Comment away, down below. Have a lovely weekend.
Boston Celtics: 9-3, 90.9 possessions per game (25th-most in the NBA), 109.3 points scored per 100 possessions (fifth), 97.7 points allowed per 100 possessions (first).
Orlando Magic: 9-3, 92.2 possessions per game (18th), 108.9 points scored per 100 possessions (eighth), 102.8 points allowed per 100 possessions (11th).
All statistics courtesy basketball-reference.com.
Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:00 am EST

Los Angeles Lakers
108, Chicago 93
Joakim Noah:
"To me, the most amazing thing about it is you're out there competing hard, and these guys are hardly breaking a sweat because they're so comfortable running their offense. They look like it's very easy."
Does the talent help? Of course. Have I seen bench units dominate starting units using the triangle offense, without breaking much of a sweat? You bet.
It's the system. And the system is what sets Los Angeles apart. You try stopping a play, mon frère, when there is no play.
The Lakers just dominated Chicago in this win. They moved the ball, attacked the offensive glass, used superior spacing, and saved the real effort for the defensive end. Which, as you've probably realized by now, isn't really needed for a team like the Bulls.
97 points per 100 possessions for Chicago, which is reallyreallyreally bad, but it felt like a proper extension. Meanwhile, the Lakers just moved the ball and finished around the rim when it could.
Which is why someone like Pau Gasol could come through with 24 points and 13 rebounds in his first game back. Was he foaming at the mouth? Was he slapping the backboard, trying to make a point?
Thu Nov 19, 2009 6:10 pm EST
I can't believe Utah against San Antonio is the passed over, third game for this evening. Two marquee teams featuring some bankable players? Can't possibly pick it, though. Not with both teams playing last night. Not with all those injuries.
And the Suns against the Hornets usually would warm us over, but with Chris Paul(notes) (two words) on the shelf, this could be something nasty. Then again, with the way the Suns can come and go defensively, New Orleans could make a game out of it.
Still, Chicago and Los Angeles. The Lakers could welcome back Pau Gasol(notes) tonight, while the Bulls might finally welcome the struggling Derrick Rose(notes) back to the status he enjoyed as a rookie last season. Any bit of improvement from Rose - and fellow backcourt mates Kirk Hinrich(notes) and John Salmons(notes) - would help. Especially with Kobe looming.
Comment away down below, watchers.
Los Angeles Lakers: 8-3, 94.4 possessions per game (ninth-most in the NBA), 105.4 points scored per 100 possessions (16th), 102.3 points allowed per 100 possessions (10th).
Chicago Bulls: 6-4, 92.3 possessions per game (16th), 98 points scored per 100 possessions (27th), 99.5 points allowed per 100 possessions (4th).
All statistics courtesy basketball-reference.com.
Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:00 am EST
Down seven at the half, the Bucks probably looked at the in-game box score that was handed out in the locker room. Noticing the names "Rafer Alston," "Trenton Hassell," "Josh Boone," and "Bobby Simmons" among the particulars, the Bucks then likely decided to act their talent-level and start the second half on a 15-0 run.
Then the Bucks, and this much is documented, actually went out and started the second half on a 15-0 run.
The Nets missed 29 of 38 attempts in the second half, and they're just terrible. The team does try, and executes as far as I can tell just up to the point where they have to make a shot. Then they miss the shot. That's not me being flip. This is New Jersey's offense.
The team features one good-to-great player in Brook Lopez, and he can't get the ball. Alston (1-10 shooting, one assist and one turnover in 33 minutes) should be a third point guard right now, at best. Guys like Boone and Hassell are only passable as rotation guys on very, very good offensive teams. Because they're zeroes, offensively.
Instead, they start. And some people still can't understand why the Nets haven't won in 12 attempts. They haven't won, people, because they're terrible. They're not owed a win or two just because they're an NBA team.
Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:00 pm EST
At some point tonight, there will be 11 NBA games, in live action. 11 of those suckers. My thumbs hurt, already.
12 games total, and as typical and as orthodox as it may seem, the Mavs and the Spurs always have to be counted on for a good one. They might be older, they might be aging, but they're the Mavs and Spurs. You need to tune in. ESPN, 9:30 p.m. Eastern.
As mentioned, though, 12 games to dive through. Eddy Curry(notes) returns to help the Knicks try to take the Pacers on, Golden State brings its mess to Boston, Toronto is in Utah, Orlando looks for revenge against Oklahoma City, and ... yeah, it doesn't seem like that great a night.
But it will be.
(It better be.)
Comment away, below.
Dallas Mavericks: 8-3, 92.5 possessions per game (15th-most in the NBA), 107.3 points scored per 100 possessions (13th), 100.4 points allowed per 100 possessions (seventh).
San Antonio Spurs: 4-4, 91 possessions per game (24th), 111.9 points scored per 100 possessions (ninth), 109.7 points allowed per 100 possessions (22nd).
All stats courtesy of basketball-reference.com.
Wed Nov 18, 2009 2:30 pm EST

Could this be it, for Allen Iverson and Jerry Stackhouse?
Stack hasn't even played this year. Iverson carped his way through three Memphis Grizzlies losses. Memphis Grizzlies losses. No other team appears to want to take a flyer, save for squads that aren't outright dismissing things so as to keep things cheery with Iverson's agent.
You don't have to stay chummy with our agent. Just pop by around 3 p.m., Eastern, hit the jump, and submit a question for Hump Day Chat. No starters, no sixth men, just hoops talk. Cheerio, and all that.
Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:40 am EST
That got out of hand, quickly.
Toronto actually hung in there for a good two and a half quarters or so before the Nuggets absolutely blitzed the Raptors with something only known to very good teams. Something called "the extra pass."
Thirty-four assists for the Nuggets in the win, on 48 field goals, and it felt like a 34-assist game. The interior passing for Denver was spectacular, all sorts of good looks and better finishes, as this went from a rather entertaining back-and-forth contest to an out and out blowout win for Denver.
Just under 133 points per 100 possessions for the Nuggets. This wasn't a pace-inflated offensive explosion. This was legit. 61.5 percent shooting, 27 made free throws and only 12 turnovers for Denver. In retrospect, the Raptors didn't have a chance.
Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:30 pm EST
You think Carmelo's licking his chops, thinking about going up against the NBA's worst defense?
Well, he isn't. He doesn't go anywhere near chops these days, which is why he's in such good shape, which is why he's having a career year, and this is also the reason why Carmelo turns just about any team defense into the NBA's worst team defense.
A bit of a problem here, though. The Nuggets are going to have to guard what has been the NBA's best offense, thus far.
Can they handle that? Sure they can. Will they try to get into a Raptors-styled shootout, and ignore their own defensive abilities? That's the question.
Denver can be baited. Then can fly out of character, winning character, rather quickly. They could also keep it together long enough to win a championship. Good thing they have an even-keeled coach like George Karl around to ... oh, wait. Went down that path again.
Toronto? They bring the show. The other night, against Phoenix? They brought the defense. We could have a great one, here.
Denver Nuggets: 7-3, 95.4 possessions per game (sixth most in the NBA), 111.3 points scored per 100 possessions (fifth), 105.5 points allowed per 100 possessions (17th).
Toronto Raptors: 5-5, 92 possessions per game (19th), 116.2 points scored per 100 possessions (first), 115.1 points allowed per 100 possessions (30th).
Ball Don't Lie is an NBA blog edited by J.E. Skeets. Email him, and follow him on Twitter.

Posted Nov 24 2009
Posted Nov 23 2009
Fantasy Insider: Start 'em, Sit 'em Part 2
Posted Nov 23 2009
Edited by MJD
Edited by 'Duk
Edited by J.E. Skeets
Edited by Greg Wyshynski
Edited by Matt Hinton
Edited by E. Brennan
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Jay Busbee
Edited by Steve Cofield
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Chris Chase
Edited by Andy Behrens