Breakfast Table: Halfway home

Get more fantasy football articles from RotoWire.com.

From: Michael Salfino
Date: Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Subject: Mid-Season Breakfast
To: Scott Pianowski

I got an early birthday present this week when Sean Payton decided to give Pierre Thomas(notes) that late TD, which was HUGE in my fantasy place with the most, um, “units” on the line. Nothing like holding your breath and hoping that the coach sticks in a guy who’s averaging about six yards per carry this year. When did Payton become Mike Shanahan, exactly?

We’re at the halfway point and the season still feels young to me. I’m doing my Jets Report Card for SNY.tv and I put together the full team power ranks for that purpose. I do the offensive and defensive ones every week for Yahoo! and some others. But this is the first time I’m really ranking overall teams since Week 4. So let’s look at who has moved the most since then. Also, there are always just a couple of teams that align in ways that defy their actual records. I’ll note them, too.

The Patriots have moved up from playoff team to Super Bowl contender. I guess we shouldn’t be surprised. They’re third overall. The Colts, though, have moved up even more, from 12th to second (behind the Saints, who I have as one-point favorites against Indy on a neutral field – say, in February). The Texans have climbed from 25th to 13th – right between Pittsburgh and Cincy. My Jets have moved way down – from eighth to 17th. Atlanta has also sunk like a stone – from 13th (which I thought was unkind back then) to, get ready, 24th?

Nothing else is radically different. Top 10 today, in order: Saints, Colts, Patriots, Packers, Vikings, Broncos, Cowboys, Eagles, Ravens and Giants. Minny, Denver and Dallas are all tied. The Packers? Being No. 1 in net picks helps them. Rodgers has only thrown two and that’s amazing considering he’s been dumped 31 times already. Green Bay is lucky I’ve taken sacks out of the index (it’s still factored into net yards per play). You know, Green Bay ranked very highly in these numbers last year, too, relative to actual record. Do we blame the coach or the QB or both? Is Rodgers just a stat guy?

Bottom 10: Browns, Raiders, Chiefs, Rams, Bucs, Lions, Titans, Panthers , Falcons and Seahawks. Atlanta is 19th in net red zone possessions, 22nd in net yards per play, 24th in net interception rate, 24th in net third down rate. What are we missing? Or do they stink? Mid-season Breakfast is served.

From: Scott Pianowski
Date: Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: Mid-Season Breakfast
To: Michael Salfino

Shanahan gets a bad rap, he never buried his best back like Payton is doing (don’t Tatum Bell(notes) me, Tater was out of the league in 15 seconds). When aliens invade the planet, they’ll identify Pierre Thomas as the Heisman winner who now plays for the Saints.

I don’t know what to make of the Patriots. I don’t like any of the running backs and the offensive line has been overrated for years. Randy Moss(notes) is just another good receiver right now, not someone teams are petrified of (you’re going to laugh at me but Wes Welker(notes) is more important to their scheme). How much credit does New England deserve for kicking the absolute tar out of Tennessee and Tampa Bay? The Pats are headed for an interesting five-game slate, three division games (the Miami deuce and the Jets payback game) along with trips to Indy and New Orleans.

Tell your computer that the Steelers defense is a completely different animal now that Troy Polamalu(notes) is back.The impact of any single defender is generally overblown, but not in this case. Still, it’s a little ridiculous to me that the Steelers are three-point favorites on the road at Denver; anyone who wants to pick Pittsburgh has to pay a luxury tax.

Maybe you should put sacks back in there. A sack isn’t just a loss of yardage for the offense, it’s a hit on the quarterback, it’s a kick in the offense’s stomach, it gets a crowd back into the game, it often brings a fumble along for the ride. I have absolutely zero data to back this up, but I’d guess most teams with a notable-sack advantage are winning teams.

Can you give us the Psychology Today view on the Cardinals? How do you beat down the Giants in Jersey, then turn around and get pasted at home to the Panthers?

There’s no way the Falcons belong down there with the Sweathogs. All three of their losses were to good teams. Matt Ryan(notes) was a little rattled in the Superdome but he’ll figure it out. They’ll need to outscore people, but there’s too many things I like about this offense. It’s just a shame they don’t have a reliable No. 2 receiver.

From: Michael Salfino
Date: Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: Mid-Season Breakfast
To: Scott Pianowski

“Shanahan” was the worst fantasy slander I could think up, unless I go to baseball and say that the Saints are “Twinning” Thomas.

I see your point about Welker. But without Moss clearing things out, and teams still respect him, Welker would be much less effective. You’re going Owens 2008 with Moss 2009 I gather. Well, it looks like you were right then and maybe you’re right now, too.

You’re right about the Patriots schedule, too. Their big tests are to come. They spit the bit in Denver. But that was all during the re-entry phase for Brady. Factoring schedules is a pain this year because there are so many more bad teams. Plus the assumption when a good team plays a bad team is that the good team performs better. But sometimes, I think, they perform worse. If you’re playing the Lions this week and you’re a normal good team and not some proven champ like the Patriots, are you going to bring your A-game? Human nature says no. If you’re not playing with a little bit of fear to get that heart racing, you’re not playing your best.

Speaking of Steelers safeties, is Ryan Clark(notes) really going to defy death and try to play in the high altitude (he has a sickle-cell trait)? I know the NFL is a macho culture and I know that players feel like they are dead when they aren’t playing due to injury because they’re treated like they don’t exist. Even Brady said the amazing thing to him was that Matt Cassel(notes) came in for the next play and the team just moved right along without him.

I like sacks as an indicator. I went out of my way to include them in the offensive ranks, too. So I gather you do not think the Packers are underachieving due to true ability because the sack picture is a major part of this calculation. It is factored into Yards Per Play, though, and even third down net. I’m always arguing with myself over this stuff. My bottom line: Rodgers hasn’t shown an ability to make the critical play at the critical time. Green Bay doesn’t have a bad defense. Why doesn’t Rodgers win more? Yes, I used to say the same thing about Drew Brees(notes), too. Brees never had happy feet like Rodgers though.

The Cardinals? Here’s what the Power Index says. They’re 19th. That says 3-4 team. So, I don’t think they’re underachieving. The Cardinals were bad at the end of last year, got hot at the perfect time like the 2007 Giants and almost rode that to a title. The Chargers could do that this year, seriously. About 10 or 15 teams could. Mediocre teams upset teams all the time if you give them enough chances. And the Giants are reeling, obviously, too.

Ryan is good, not great – yet. The Falcons offense is similar (your quality is almost always reflected by the quality of your QB). I don’t believe in the Atlanta defense at all. They’re like the Cardinals, don’t you think? In the mix, but not bona fide. They’re in the middle tier of teams that needs a bunch of things to break right at the right time. So I think their ranking is just mildy unfair – they should be 15-to-20, not 23. I do wish the Steelers were higher. And I definitely wish the Packers were lower. Now close up shop. You know what I hate? Teacher Convention week. I get the kids for two more days and the teachers don’t even go to the flippin’ convention.

From: Scott Pianowski
Date: Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Mid-Season Breakfast
To: Michael Salfino

The common link between Shanahan and Payton: Mike Bell(notes). At least we’re finally spared the burden of Malcom Floyd(notes) behind Chris Chambers(notes), though the Chargers may have cut Chambers due to off-the-field issues.

Did you catch Roy Williams this week? He’s basically claiming that Tony Romo(notes) throws accurate passes to all the other chaps but not to him. It’s time to demand the Roy Williams Reality Show, where the pizza guys don’t get tipped and Williams always sees a Pro Bowl difference-maker when he looks in the mirror.

A few random thoughts and predictions which you can debunk in the comments (the table never really ends, leftovers are served all week): I’m worried Matt Schaub(notes) is going to hit a major rough patch now that Owen Daniels(notes) is out for the season. … I think the Titans might be able to coax a Top 20 quarterback season out of Vince Young(notes) (okay, I’m not aiming very high, but there’s utility to that level in two-QB groups). … The Broncos are headed for a fall if they don’t add more intermediate and deep passing to their playbook. … The Ravens will be one of the Final Four teams standing in January. … I get a little queasy admitting it, but Brett Favre(notes) is a legitimate MVP candidate right now. I’d still go with Drew Brees, but I don’t see how Favre isn’t in the Top 5. … If you were starting a new franchise from scratch tomorrow, where is Matt Ryan on your board?

41 Comments

Post a Comment
  1. J B
    41. Posted by J B Mon Nov 9 1:33pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Well Dan B, if you'd open your eyes, rather than having your nose deep in Pinhead Pianowski's and Sally Salfino's anal opening...you'd notice that post 39 has been deleted.

    Now I'm sure it was either Pinhead Pianowski or Sally Salfino that deleted it, as they hate being showed up...Pinhead Pianowski especially...had the gutless cowards not deleted my post, you would have been able to read my fantasy accomplishments.

    Maybe if you kiss up to Pinhead Pianowski or Sally Salfino, they'll have the testicular fortitude to place my post back on here...not that any of you losers will believe it, and not that I really give a rat's ass...but it's all fact!
  2. Dan B
    40. Posted by Dan B Mon Nov 9 11:50am EST

    Report Abuse

    we'll see how ortons stats look after tonights game.
    would they have gotten beat down by the ravens so badly two weeks ago if they still had cutler? i think not
    cutler isn't a super qb but he's better than orton.
    i'm not a public leaguer. nor a loud mouth.

    to J B - exactly what have you said that proves you're any smarter than MDS or me or anyone for that matter? i havent seen anything
  3. <i>million_dollar_sleeper</i>
    38. Posted by million_dollar_sleeper Mon Nov 9 1:27am EST

    Report Abuse

    orton's qb % has risen 15 pts. hes in a new system... what gives?
    maybe its cuz he has a real o-line, and actually WRs to throw to now.....
    im not putting money in your collection plate. dont preach to me
    only one way to settle it. im ready for your best excuse
    ill be over here doing the icky woods shuffle, doing a little early celebrating
  4. Salfino
    37. Posted by Salfino Sun Nov 8 11:11pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Cutler has a 83 QB rating. The test is to find a QB who is playing good on a team that's playing bad. It's very hard to do. Of course, it happens very infrequently. But the exception does not disprove the rule.
  5. <i>million_dollar_sleeper</i>
    36. Posted by million_dollar_sleeper Sun Nov 8 7:56pm EST

    Report Abuse

    id be more than happy to smash the both of you MDS wanna bes
    google the name son, youll find your beatdown awaiting you
    ive made my reputation squashing loud mouf public leaguers

    cutler = good qb
    bears = crap team

    hello? mcfly!

    i dont come here to try to prove im smarter than anyone. i do that by beating everyone
  6. J B
    35. Posted by J B Sun Nov 8 7:58am EST

    Report Abuse

    No, not whatever Dan B. I was speaking at Scott "The PINHEAD" Pianowski, then for some reason or another...wanting attention I'm thinking. YOU are the one who started in with your attack on me little man...then when I responded, you cried like a punk ass little b*tch! Now had you kept your big mouth shut, and said nothing...I wouldn't have even realized you even exsisted.

    million_dollar_JOKE - I've seen your senseless drivel numerous times, and not once have I ever seen a post that you've made to show that you have any knowledge of any sport! In fact, I have to give a little credit to Pinhead Pianowski and Sally Salfino here...they both have more knowledge of the game than you'll ever hope to have...not by much, but easily more than you.

    Damn Pinhead Pianowski, that is one of the most, if not the most intelligent thing you've said in a long time! You're right, talk is cheap. However, it's not the bottom line, as the bottom line is...I issued you a challenge, you haven't accepted it, as you're too gutless to accept it, and still can't find the balls to man the hell up and admit it!
  7. Dan B
    34. Posted by Dan B Sat Nov 7 11:29pm EST

    Report Abuse

    salfino is right it is a qb's game. tell that to chicago fans you say MDS? so now you're saying cutler is as good as brady/manning/brees? not even close. the colts o-line isnt very good but manning gets it done and without much of a running game. cutler isnt that type of qb. an excellent qb trumps all. look at green bay.
    how can you say farve isnt even the MVP of his own team. its pretty much the same team as last year and yeah they were good but they would probably have at least 2 more losses this year already without farve. AP is a necessity for that offense yes but Farve is the one who has taken them to the next level. all they needed was a good decision maker? have you seen some of the throws farve has made this year? example: the game vs the 49ers. they lose that game without farve and that spectacular catch.

    self proclaimed expert blah blah blah. im not gonna try and say im some "all knowing fantasy football expert" but i know football and i would love to play in a league with some experts. id play you too MDS. (notice i didnt include you as an expert)
  8. <i>million_dollar_sleeper</i>
    33. Posted by million_dollar_sleeper Sat Nov 7 9:21pm EST

    Report Abuse

    not a team game? wow, tell that to Bears fans

    self proclaimed expert: a person who possesses the characteristics and skills of an "expert". however, a "SPE" also has the cojones to take on all comers while seeking out the best competition, the ability to consistently beat the opposition and has the skills to argue any stance whether or not they actually believe of theyre saying (some ppl call that your wood paige poker face)

    now you can see why i prefer the title, self-proclaimed expert
  9. Salfino
    32. Posted by Salfino Sat Nov 7 6:57pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Definition of an expert: someone who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field and can impart the wisdom learned from those mistakes.
  10. Salfino
    31. Posted by Salfino Sat Nov 7 6:55pm EST

    Report Abuse

    MDS, you've already failed Football 101. Football isn't a team game. It's a QB game. The Colts team, for example, is mediocre at best and most likely significantly worse. Sure they have some good guys, all teams do. The Colts aren't really the Colts. They are Peyton and the Pips.
  11. <i>million_dollar_sleeper</i>
    30. Posted by million_dollar_sleeper Sat Nov 7 6:35pm EST

    Report Abuse

    chester taylor ran for 1,000 yards with no qb. reggie bush cant do that with a good one
    comparing PT to AP isnt even possible. i loves me some PT but cmon
    yes colston is great but he doesnt have the talent of Percy and Sidney is comparable
    berrian is better than meachem n moore

    thats not the basis of my argument. its the fact that the saints offense revolves around brees while the vikes offense is all about AP. and yes it is a FACT, tavaris is the worst qb of all time. he wasnt even a division I player. and you compared him to Favre. the best qb of all time.

    arguing for a MVP in football is pretty useless considering the sport is completely team based, but guys like Brees n Brady n Peyton Manning are pretty essential pieces to their team. the vikes were a good team last year without favre. all they needed was a good decision maker. not a player with a high talent ceiling and no mentality. trent dilfer wasnt the MVP of the super bowl ravens team.

    a self proclaimed expert doesnt need anyone laying down that distinction... by definition
    ive chosen to be a self-proclaimed expert. I refused the title of "expert" that Virgil dubbed me
  12. Salfino
    29. Posted by Salfino Sat Nov 7 5:13pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Note to all self-proclaimed Gurus: By definition, someone else has to call you that.
  13. Salfino
    28. Posted by Salfino Sat Nov 7 5:10pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Wait, MDS, is that a subtle dig at PT? Okay, AP is Superman, I agree. But PT is DAMN talented. I mean, he kept Rashard Mendenhall glued to the bench in college and Mendenhall is pretty good. Colston is also a freak, I confess. I was wrong about him. Henderson and Meachem are good, too. Bush is a good third-down guy. I really think it's a pretty weak argument to give Brees the edge because his players aren't as good. And you can't say something truly idiotic like "Jackson is the worst QB in the history of the NFL" while you're alleging someone else is saying something dumb. Really? You meant that? There are worse QBs starting in the NFL right now than Jackson. We can start with the guy in Oakland.
  14. <i>million_dollar_sleeper</i>
    27. Posted by million_dollar_sleeper Sat Nov 7 4:27pm EST

    Report Abuse

    favre isnt even the mvp of his own team's, AP is the teams catalyst
    might as well be arguing the morneau vs jeter talk when mauer was the true mvp
    youre comparing favre to tavaris jackson with your statement. tavaris made the vikes passing game completely worthless. he is the worst qb in the history of the nfl. the only reason he had a job was cuz of the price (traded picks to over draft him) chilly paid during the draft. dont forget about the addition of percy harvin. favres supporting cast is much better than brees. the only good thing tavaris was good for was keeping sidney rice's fantasy price very low. im sure the grizzly vet favre doesnt have as much trouble adjusting to a familiar system (which feeds off the running game) than a young qb like cutler. hand off to AP, throw a few slants, let sidney jump n catch. i could do that
  15. pianow
    26. Posted by pianow Sat Nov 7 4:17pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Bottom line, talk is cheap. Anyone can say "I'm the man, I'm the Guru, etc." How about actually putting yourself on the line with some *predictions* and statements? Debunk some myths. We do that every day with our work.
  16. Salfino
    25. Posted by Salfino Sat Nov 7 4:14pm EST

    Report Abuse

    MDS: In my opinion, it's harder to come into a new team with new players in August without any minicamp vs. Brees being in the same system with the same players for years. Also note that this Vikings supporting cast, sans Peterson, wasn't worth a hill of beans last year.
  17. <i>million_dollar_sleeper</i>
    24. Posted by million_dollar_sleeper Sat Nov 7 3:09pm EST

    Report Abuse

    JB. shut up, its my duty to harass salfino n pianow
    technically what you issue are not challenges, since you suck

    "5. Favre is the MVP because he's had the higher degree of difficulty. The loss to the Steelers hurts. They deserved to win that game."

    what are you talking about salfino? favre has the easiest QB job in the NFL. no other qb has the running support, oline protection, defense and weapons at his disposal like favre does.
  18. Dan B
    23. Posted by Dan B Sat Nov 7 12:47pm EST

    Report Abuse

    whatever. arent you the one who started the childish name calling in the first place? i simply said what pianow probably wanted to say but couldnt cuz he works for yahoo. then i moved on cuz i wanted to talk about... uhh whats this article about??? oh yeah FANTASY FOOTBALL. im not gonna waste anymore time with you other than to say that you saying im a hyprocrite is just another in a long line of ridiculous claims from you
  19. J B
    22. Posted by J B Sat Nov 7 12:14pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Dan B - You're bit of a hypocrite aren't you, sort of "The Pot Calling The Kettle Black" aren't you? Now anyone who has a comeback like yours...and I quote..." JB you're a douche". More than likely hasn't the intelligence to understand that saying, so I'll explain it to you in the simplest terms. You are the pot calling the kettle black when you point to another person and accuse that person of doing something that YOU are GUILTY of doing yourself.

    Salfino - Bill O'Reilly, or you serious little man? Personally, I can't stand the son-of-a-@#$%...kind of reminds me of most of the so-called "fantasy experts", he hasn't a clue as to what he's talking about either! I bet I can guess who yours is...Rush Limbaugh?
  20. Salfino
    21. Posted by Salfino Sat Nov 7 10:38am EST

    Report Abuse

    This is what happens when your model for public discourse is Bill O'Reilly.
  21. Dan B
    20. Posted by Dan B Sat Nov 7 7:28am EST

    Report Abuse

    geez J B, you ruined a comment section that usually has a good and interested discussion/debate about fantasy football. Pianow is right man you arent doing yourself any favors with the way you attack in every one of your comments
  22. J B
    19. Posted by J B Sat Nov 7 6:31am EST

    Report Abuse

    No Pinhead Pianowski, you're the one who doesn't get it. I've been issuing you, as well as the other so-called experts a challenge for the past three years now...to prove to each of you that not one of you are any sort of an expert!

    And to show you and the other so-called experts, that not only can I compete against you, or any of the other so-called experts, I could easily win in any league(s) any of you are involved in.

    Now ideally it'd be a league in which all of you so-called experts are involved in, as simply beating one of you so-called experts wouldn't be enough...I want to put all of you in your places by taking home the championship.

    Hell, all of you are good in ranking/picking the "no-brainers" who'll have good games, and in who to win with...hell, give a trained monkey a banana and he could do the same. However, what none of you are very good at is ranking/picking those players who aren't no-brainers week in and week out that can make or break ones season in fantasy football...now that is the real test, as it seperates the winners from the losers!

    Now as for all of your lame ass excuses, save them for someone else...as I'm not buying them, because the bottom line is simple...none of you so-called experts have the testicular fortitude to accept my simple challenge. As for you, it's like I've said...if you don't have the guts to accept a challenge, simply man the hell up and admit it!
  23. pianow
    18. Posted by pianow Sat Nov 7 4:03am EST

    Report Abuse

    JB, I don't think you get it. It has nothing to do with me ducking a challenge. The people who know me will vouch that I'm (for better or for worse) very competitive. I've organized 4-5 side leagues *since the NFL season has started* for crying out loud. Salfino could probably show you thousands of emails showing us debating (arguing) about this or that.

    But the thing is, it's always respectful. We don't personally attack each other. We don't resort to name calling, ad hominem attacks, that sort of thing.

    I have no desire to compete with someone who's goal is, at least in part, to get under my skin. I don't enjoy that. Respectful competition, bring it on, I'm always for that. But the way you've chosen to go about this, that approach is never going to work with me. I don't want to be in a competitive environment with someone who's constantly acting in an antagonistic manner towards me.

    If you can find others who go for your style and want to compete with you, more power to you. But I'm not interested. It has nothing to do with your skills, it's your approach.
  24. J B
    17. Posted by J B Fri Nov 6 6:21pm EST

    Report Abuse

    Yeah, just as I thought...Pinhead Pianowski. If you're gutless coward, just man up and admit it!

    Sounds to me like K-Mic is talking from experience...

    Dan B, how long did it take you to come up with that 10 year old like comeback? You should become a Y! Sports Blogger!

    Ken P, I'm not feeding off of anything little man...I simply challenged an "expert", and he hasn't the guts to accept my challenge like a man...

    Now back to Scott "The Pinhead" Pianowski...didn't come to spam the board, while posting inane comments that offer nothing other than "hey, you suck!"

    Read my posts again, and point out to me where it is exactly I said..."hey, you suck!" I simply challenged you, which I've done for a couple of years now. In fact, it's a challenge I've made to all of you so-called "fantasy experts"...and so far not one of you have had the guts to accept the challenge.

    The "inner circle"? That's a good one! I don't want to be a part of the "inner circle", as I'm not the kind of person who lacks self-esteem that I need to be a part of anything to feel like I "fit in". I simply want to go up against all of you so-called "fantasy experts" to show all of you that you are not experts, as it'd be the easiest championship I'd ever win!
Sign in to post a comment, or sign up for a free account

Video Spotlight